Page 505 - 5G Basics - Core Network Aspects
P. 505

Core network aspects                                            1


            7.3.4.1    Explicit control of handover execution at the UE

            In this case, when the HDC-FE has finished preparation of the new path as described in clause 7.3.3, it issues
            requests to the tunnel upper and lower ends to commit to the new path. Details of the protocol required to
            do this without losing packets are out of scope. Once the HDC-FE is informed that commitment is complete,
            the HDC-FE issues requests to the tunnel upper and lower ends to delete the old tunnel. It sends a request
            to RACF to deallocate the QoS resources assigned to the old path, from the old access point to the anchor
            point.

            7.3.4.2    Link down indication or unbind indication
            If the HDC-FE receives a 'link down' indication from the L2HE-FE instance associated with the old link, or an
            unbind  indication  from  the  MLM-FE,  the  procedure  is  similar  to  the  procedure  just  described, with  the
            exception that if the tunnel lower end was the UE, it does not have to be directed to commit to the new path
            or to delete the old tunnel. The details of the protocol required to avoid packet loss in this case are out of
            the  scope  of  this  Recommendation.  They  may  differ  from  what  is  required  in  the  case  described  by
            clause 7.3.4.1.
            7.3.5   Routing optimization considerations for network-based handover

            When a correspondent UE communicates with the mobile UE, normally packets from the correspondent UE
            will be intercepted by the transport function associated with the MLM-FE(C) (i.e., the L3HEF at the anchor
            point), then encapsulated and tunneled to the current location of UE. For data path optimization, the MLM-
            FE(P) to which a correspondent UE is associated may, based on administrative policies, cooperate with the
            MLM-FE(P)  to  which  the  mobile  UE  is  associated  to  establish  a  direct  tunnel  between  their  respective
            networks.  At  that  point  the  L3HEF  at  each  end  will  encapsulate  packets  based  on  the  location  binding
            information exchanged between the two MLM-FE(P)s and forward them directly to its peer L3HEF through
            the tunnel between them. The peer L3HEF delivers the decapsulated packets to the correspondent or mobile
            UE respectively.

            The L3HEF is required to be aware of active communication between the mobile UE and correspondent UE.
            The process is triggered when it detects a flow that matches policy indicating that routing optimization may
            be attempted. It then indicates route optimization to its associated MLM-FE(P) via the HDC-FE. The MLM-
            FE(P) sends a location management message to the MLM-FE(C) which contains a routing optimization (RO)
            indication.

            Upon  receiving  an  RO  request  message  from  the  MLM-FE(P),  the  MLM-FE(C)  will  perform  routing
            optimization operation not only with the MLM-FE(P) associated with the mobile UE, but also with the MLM-
            FE(P)  associated  with  the  correspondent  UE.  The  MLM-FE(C)  may  look  up  its  location  binding  list  and
            determine whether the two MLM-FE(P) instances have both registered to it. In the case where both MLM-
            FE(P) instances are registered to the same MLM-FE(C) instance, the latter will pass the location of each MLM-
            FE(P) to the other.

            If the two MLM-FE(P) instances register to different MLM-FE(C) instances, the MLM-FE(C) associated with
            the mobile UE and MLM-FE(C) associated with the correspondent UE will coordinate with each other to
            provide the location of each MLM-FE(P) instance to the other. If the MLM-FE(C) associated with the mobile
            UE fails to retrieve the location of the MLM-FE(C) associated with the correspondent UE, it will notify the
            MLM-FE(P) associated with the mobile UE that route optimization is not available.

            After routing optimization operations are completed between the two MLM-FE(P)s, the location binding
            cache in each MLM-FE(P) is updated and the optimized tunnel is installed. The details for the common MLM-
            FE(C) case are shown in Figure 10.
            NOTE 1 – The messages required for routing optimization are shown in Figure 10, but their detailed definition is for
            further study.
            NOTE 2 – The HDC-FE is shown as a centralized function for convenience, and MLM-FE(P) A is arbitrarily chosen as the
            initiating entity to start tunnel set-up. It is more realistic to assume that both MLM-FE(P) instances will notify HDC-FE
            and tunnel set-up and take-down will proceed in a more distributed fashion.




                                                                                                         495
   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510