Page 713 - Shaping smarter and more sustainable cities - Striving for sustainable development goals
P. 713

Political support is indispensable to give a guideline and guarantee the safe transaction of open
            data, namely publish and use of open data in smart sustainable city. Here, another trade‐off comes.
            It is natural for data provider as the source of open data to minimize the leak of the information for
            preserving  privacy.  Political  support  gives  the  clear  burden  for  fulfilling  or  negotiating  both
            requirements of data provider and data services. This support should be varied according to the
            services and applications.



            5       Technologies related to open data in SSC

            It is found that open data is comprisedof a great diversity of research streams and related topics in
            SSC. However, most connected and influencing open data are the following technology streams.


            5.1  Metadata management

                                                                    27
            Metadata is "data about data", of any sort in any media . In other words, metadata is data that
            describes other data, which facilitates the understanding, usage, and management of data, both by
            human and computers. Metadata summarizes basic information about data, which can make finding
                                                                 28
            and working with particular instances of data easier . This commonly defines the structure or
            schema  of  the  primary  data.  International  standards  apply  to  metadata.  Much  work  is  being
            accomplished in the national and international standards communities, especially ANSI (American
            National  Standards  Institute)  and  ISO  (International  Organization  for  Standardization)  to  reach
                                                 29
            consensus on standardizing metadata .The core standard is ISO/IEC 11179‐1:2004 and subsequent
            standards (see ISO/IEC 11179).All published registrations according to this standard cover just the
            definition of metadata and do not serve the structuring of metadata storage or retrieval neither any
            administrative standardization. It is important to note that this standard refers to metadata as the
            data about containers of the data and not to metadata as the data about the data contents. An
            important reason for creating descriptive metadata is to facilitate discovery of relevant information.
            In addition to resource discovery, metadata can help to organize electronic resources, facilitate
            interoperability and legacy resource integration, to provide digital identification, and to support
            archiving and preservation. According to NISO's definitions, there are three main types of metadata:
                                                                                    30
            descriptive metadata, structural metadata and administrative metadata . Descriptive metadata
            describes a resource for purposes such as discovery and identification. It can include elements such
            as title, abstract, author, and keywords. There are many kinds of examples of descriptive metadata,
            such as CDWA (Categories for the Description of Works of Art), VRA (Visual Resources Association),
            DC (Dublin Core), FGDC (Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata, for Federal Geospatial
            Data  Committee),  GILS  (Government  Information  Locator  Service),  EAD  (Encoded  Archival
            Description), TEI (Text Encoding Initiative) and so on.Structural metadata indicates how compound
            objects are put together, for example, how pages are ordered to form chapters. Administrative
            metadata provides information to help manage a resource, such as when and how it was created,
            file type and other technical information, and who can access it.





            ____________________
            27   Please see: http://en.factolex.com/metadata.
            28   Mize, J.; Habermann, R.T. Automating metadata for dynamic datasets. OCEANS 2010. 2010, Page(s): 1‐6.
            29   Please see:http://www.niso.org/publications/press/UnderstandingMetadata.pdf.

            30   NISO Press, National Information Standards Organization. Understanding Metadata.

            ITU‐T's Technical Reports and Specifications                                                  703
   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718