Page 387 - Shaping smarter and more sustainable cities - Striving for sustainable development goals

Appendix A

Table A.1 – Preferred architectures in various examined cases

Findings
Case
Architecture Organization
European Urban Intelligence Measurement System Project (various European Cities)
Smart Cities

Two cities in SOA State‐Owned‐Enterprise (SOE) run by the
Netherlands municipality

Public Organization (i.e., Gdansk (Poland),
Masdar (UAE))
n‐tier architecture (4 layers): Public Private Partnership (PPP) (i.e.,
52 cities
Network, Content, Intelligence, e‐services Amsterdam (Netherlands))
Private Companies (Malaga (Spain), New
Songdo (Korea))
Helsinki, n‐tier architecture (3 layers): State‐Owned‐Enterprise (SOE) run by the
Kyoto information, interface, interaction Municipality

n‐tier architecture (3 layers):
Dubai Public Organization (Government)
Infrastructure, data, application
n‐tier architecture (6 layers):
Trikala, State‐Owned‐Enterprise (SOE) run by the
Greece data, infrastructure, interconnection, Municipality
business, service and user
n‐tier architecture (4 layers):
SOE run by the Municipality in cooperation
Barcelona code, nodes, infrastructure and with the local university
environment

Blacksburg n‐tier architecture (3 layers): PPP between Bell Atlantic Telecoms, Virginia
Electronic infrastructure, content, community Tech, Municipality
Village
PPP between Municipality and Liander grid
Amsterdam n‐tier architecture
Operator

n‐tier architecture (4 layers): ICT
Singapore infrastructure, Cognitive infrastructure, Public Organization
Services, Customers

ITU‐T's Technical Reports and Specifications 377