Page 193 - Shaping smarter and more sustainable cities - Striving for sustainable development goals
P. 193

g.      International,  Regional  and  Multilateral  Organizations:  They  include  UN  agencies  and
                    multilateral  organizations.  They  can  be  promoters  of  initiatives  towards  human
                    development, environmental sustainability and improvement of quality of life worldwide.
                    They can offer funding opportunities, and are promoters of SSC initiatives.
            h.      Industry associations: Since industries are interested in the deployment of SSC, industry
                    associations also work towards the success of this new model.
            i.      Academia, research organizations and specialized bodies: They study SSC and associated
                    trends, including its impacts and contributions to sustainable development.
            j.      Citizens and citizen organizations: As inhabitants of cities, citizens are affected both directly
                    and indirectly by SSC deployment.

            k.      Urban Planners: Their expertise is important to better understand how to include ICTs into
                    medium and long term city planning, as well as to consider urban complexities.

            l.      Standardization bodies: These organizations are critical to ensure a common terminology
                    and minimum characteristics of a SSC, as well as to define measurement methods to assess
                    the performance and sustainability of city services based on ICT technologies.

            The roles and responsibilities of each of these stakeholders will be further explained in section 4.

            2.2  Categorization of stakeholders

            The stakeholders included in the list are then categorized according to two different criteria:

            a)      According  to  their  role  and  participation  in  a  project  or  projects  related  to  SSC.  This
                    classification is based on the LFA methodology, as follows:
                      Active: This refers to all the actors that have the resources and the power to influence
                        the  initiative.  In  this  report  all  stakeholders  have  been  classified  as  active  because
                        potentially any of them can influence the SSC agenda. When making this classification
                        at the local level this list is usually shorter since not all the actors who potentially could,
                        will have the resources and power to do so.
                      Beneficiaries: These are the stakeholders that will directly benefit from the deployment
                        of SSC.

                      Affected:  This  category  includes  all  actors  that  will  be  somehow  affected  by  the
                        deployment of SSC. They can be further divided in potential supporters, and potential
                        opponents.

            b)      According to their role as drivers or enablers of SSC processes and solutions.
                      Enablers  of  technology:  They  provide  the  technology  and/or  the  technological
                        solutions.
                      Drivers of technology: These are the stakeholders that incorporate technology and SSC
                        solutions into their processes, for example in city services provision processes.
                      Enablers of the SSC: They facilitate the technical & policy framework needed for SSC by
                        collaborating  to  some  extent  into  concepts  and  KPIs  definition,  infrastructure
                        development, standardization, etc.

            Figure 2 illustrates a classification of SSC stakeholders at a general level, based on the categories
            explained above. It is relevant to note that, given the specific context and set of stakeholders that
            operate in a particular city, the implementation of this method will slightly differ from one city to
            another.



            ITU‐T's Technical Reports And Specifications                                                  183
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198