Page 150 - Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2016
P. 150

discrimination, discriminatory provisioning of   as well to use commercial resources in order to
               network facilities, overpricing of essential facilities   achieve development goals. 25
               and other network elements and services provided
               to competitors, unfair trade practices, tie-in sales,   Some of these issues can be clarified through
               and anticompetitive bundling).                  asking questions such as these:

               One of the more likely outcomes is that an      •  Are the regulatory arrangements for
               m-service or app that rides on a large network     infrastructure-sharing adequate to achieve
               will ultimately benefit from network effects,      goals for national access?
               much to the discomfort of other operators in
               the same market.  This happened in Kenya when   •  Are the exclusive arrangements governing
               Airtel Money, which operates the second-biggest    m-services and apps riding on MNOs and
               mobile money platform in Kenya, petitioned         operating systems raising competition
               the Competition Authority of Kenya (CAK) to        concerns?
               investigate Safaricom for alleged abuse of its
               position as the market leader in M-commerce.    •  What is the impact of these exclusive
                                                      22
                                                                  arrangements on pricing? Are the tariffs fair
               Airtel Kenya had claimed that Safaricom’s charges   and non-discriminative?
               for customers to send money to Airtel Money
               accounts were double the amount Safaricom       •  Have all relevant stakeholders in this issue
               charged to send money to its own customers.        been identified and consulted widely for input?
               Airtel Kenya also wanted Safaricom to allow
               M-Pesa agents to deal with other agents like    Answers to these questions will guide appropriate
               Yu money, Airtel money and Mobikash.   In a     regulatory interventions to avoid entrenching
                                                23
               demonstration of regulation in a multi-sectoral   anti-competitive market features.  Particularly
               space (and of regulatory forbearance), the CAK   important are considerations of pricing, as the
               deferred the issue to the Central Bank of Kenya   cost of sending a text message or purchasing an
               (CBK) Communications Authority of Kenya (CA).   app ultimately will determine the affordability and
                                                               access to the m-service or app.  Regulators must
               In July 2014, the CA ordered Safaricom to allow its   ensure that the interconnection framework is
               mobile money agents to also operate with other   clearly defined and that interconnection charges
               platforms.  The CA further recommended that     are based on objective, economically sound, and
               the CBK handle the petition on M-Pesa tariffs, as   solidly substantiated costs.
               these were charges for financial services.   The
                                                  24
               M-Pesa agency system initially operated within the   It is also apparent that in aiming for a robust
               Safaricom network only, but now is interoperable   competitive environment, the telecommunication
               with other networks.                            construct for competition regulation may be
                                                               inadequate.  It is incumbent on regulators to set
               The scenario just described raises several issues for   appropriate safeguards and then to intervene to
               regulators to consider when attempting to foster   leverage opportunities in the digital ecosystem.
               diffusion of m-services and apps.  It indicates that   Introduction of number portability, interoperability
               assessment of competition concerns in the digital   and infrastructure-sharing are other mechanisms
               economy requires an in-depth investigation to   that could also be considered.  These safeguards
               evaluate the “pain point” being raised.  It is clear   will be discussed later in this chapter.
               that a restrictive arrangement does arise when an
               m-service is locked into an MNO or when an app is
               locked into a single operating system.  This has the   5.3.4   Stimulating demand – universal access
               potential to raise competition concerns.  The lock-
               in effect has spurred discussions about platform   The network reach and intelligence to support
               agnosticism and the creation of open mobile apps.    access to m-services and apps remains on the
               This related to a desire to see free sharing of apps   regulator’s radar now, more than ever before.
               on the mass market, in order to achieve critical   The urgency to bridge access gaps compels new
               development goals in fields such as m-learning,   ideas and creativity in order to identify optimal
                                                               strategies for achievement of universal service.




          132  Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2016
   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155