Page 147 - Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2016
P. 147

informed decisions about their information and   and foster the long-term development of the
               privacy?  Can they ensure that their privacy is   ICT market.   In recent years, the sector has      Chapter 5
                                                                         19
               respected and protected by those designing and   undergone structural changes in response to
               building mobile applications?  There are valid   convergence and innovation, and it needs to be
               concerns about whether consumers are able to    flexible enough to accommodate further change
               make informed choices in an increasingly complex   and review.  As Figure 5.1 illustrates, regulation is
               marketplace.                                    not intended to serve as an end in itself.

               M-services and apps are increasingly vulnerable   While the conventional regulatory framework is
               to security concerns.  Networks worldwide are   necessary to resolve disputes, address competition
               falling victim to hacking by cyber criminals.    concerns, protect consumers, and attain national
               Cases of fraud, misuse of data and use of mobile   goals such as universal access and economic
               phones to commit crimes are all on the increase,   development, it can also become a bottleneck to
               undermining trust and confidence in the digital   innovation and investment if it fails to respond
               ecosystem.                                      to the issues of the day.  The need to adopt
                                                               regulatory mechanisms within a cross-sectoral
               These concerns raise weighty issues and call for a   framework is a critical interdependency for
               thoughtful consideration of policy and regulatory   m-services and applications. However, this was not
               action going forward.  While there is a need to   anticipated within the conventional, “silo” style of
               protect personal freedoms, it is important to do   enacting regulations.  There must be a paradigm
               it in a way that does not hamper innovation.  It   shift to permit a new way of doing things.
               is important to uphold trust and confidence in
               the digital ecosystem and take active steps to   The first step is to identify the objective of
               mitigate the emerging concerns.  Regulators need   regulation before articulating a framework to
               to consider whether their policy and regulatory   achieve that objective.  The regulatory approach
               frameworks are fit for purpose, in order to achieve   to be used is equally important once the object
               a delicate balance for m-services and apps to   of regulation has been identified.  In the early
               thrive within the digital economy.              stages of competitive markets, the approach
                                                               was to prescribe rules, rights and obligations.
                                                               However, the general evolution has been toward
               5.3    Policy and regulatory perspectives       a “light-touch” approach to encourage and foster
                                                               m-services and applications by giving room to
               This section of the chapter seeks to highlight policy   embrace ideas that were not anticipated earlier.
               and regulatory perspectives to be considered in
               promoting growth of m-services and apps, while   The evolution of the M-Pesa mobile money
               at the same time ensuring that innovation is not   transfer service is a classic case in illustrating
               stifled and that consumer benefits are maximized.    how a paradigm shift was needed to overcome
               In doing so, this section will identify critical   traditional regulatory arrangements in order to
               regulatory principles that should be addressed   enable the entry of an innovative m-service (See
               and will offer perspectives for leveraging the   Box 5.3).  Cross-sectoral forbearance was applied
               anticipated benefits against the risks.  The    to deal with an innovation that was not anticipated
               perspectives shared in this section will contribute   and hence not accommodated by either the
               to a series of critical questions that policy-makers   telecommunication or financial regulations that
               and regulators can use as a guide in considering   it straddled.  The solution was a light-touch
               proposals to foster m-services and apps.        regulatory approach, a gradual introduction of
                                                               payment-system regulation for better financial
                                                               oversight, all combined with requirements for
               5.3.1   Goals of regulation                     interoperability between the Safaricom network
                                                               with the other networks, to foster competition.
               Most information and communications technology
               (ICT) regulatory frameworks were designed to
               guide structural changes as the sector transitioned
               from monopoly to competition.  Regulations then
               were maintained to promote effective competition




                                                                               Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2016  129
   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152