Page 251 - Kaleidoscope Academic Conference Proceedings 2024
P. 251

Innovation and Digital Transformation for a Sustainable World




           consumer,  location  of  tangible  property  location  of  the   for Climate Action.” World Bank and International
           consumer,  location  of  tangible  property  from  where  the   Telecommunication Union, 2024.
           activities  take  place  etc.  This  leads  to  a  pressure  on  the
           domestic customers and international cross-border suppliers.   [2] Reuven  S  Avi-Yonah,  “International  Tax  as
                                                                     International Law: An Analysis of the International
           For illustrative purposes, the eligibility of the framework of   Tax Regime,” Cambridge University Press, 2007.
           jurisdiction  of  destination,  where  the  consumer  /  service
           recipient  resides  in  the  cases  of  B2C  transactions  is   [3] National Institute of Standards and Technology, US
           ineffective as the GST is not paid by the customer, rather it   Department of Commerce, “The NIST Definition of
           is  paid  by  the  supplier  on  the  basis  of  their  own  self-  Cloud  Computing,”  Special  Publication  pp.  800–
           assessment. In the cases wherein the supplier is not based in   145, 2011.
           the local jurisdiction of India, the same cannot be completed
           under the GST law unless a specific standard regulation for   [4] The  Organization  for  Economic  Cooperation  and
           payment under the RCM mechanism is implemented in this    Development (OECD), “Model Tax Convention on
           regard.                                                   Income and on Capital,” Commentary on Article 12
                                                                     para 12 of the OECD Model, 2017.
              10. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
           The  detailed  independent  discussion  on  indirect  taxes   [5] RAW  Thelosen,  “Straight-Through  Processing:
           provided in the previous section highlights the necessity and   Difficulties in Applying the Royalties Article of the
           mechanism for standardization of the indirect tax regime in   OECD Model,” Bulletin for International Taxation
           respect  of  the  ICT  solutions  for  the  future.  Generally,  an   (Volume 64), No. 6, 2010.
           ‘import’  means  bringing  goods  into  one  country  from
           another country. As per Customs Act, 1962, IMPORT means   [6] Technical   Advisory   Group   on  “Treaty
           bringing into India from a place outside India.           Characterization   of   Electronic   Commerce
                                                                     Payments,”  “Tax  Treaty  Characterization  Issues
           India being a signatory to the International Convention on   Arising  from  E-commerce,”  Report  to  Working
           the  Harmonized  Commodity  Description  and  Coding      Party  No  1  of  the  OECD  Committee  on  Fiscal
           System,  1983  (‘HS  Convention’)  has  adopted  the      Affairs, 2001.
           classification codes and the General Rules of Interpretation
           as prescribed under the Convention. The classification of the   [7] Lothar Determann, “What Happens in the Cloud:
           goods is carried out on the basis of the  HS governed by the   Software  as  a  Service  and  Copyrights,”  Berkeley
           Customs  Tariff  Act,  1975.  The  OECD  has  carried  out   Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, 2015.
           resounding work regarding the classification of the things
           such  as  the  digital  supplies,  including  cloud  computing   [8] Alexandra  Bal,  “The  Sky’s  the  Limit—Cloud-
           transactions, are considered services for GST and customs
           purposes.                                                 Based Services in an International Perspective”,  :
                                                                     Bulletin for International Taxation, Vol. 68, No. 9,
           Despite the clarification regarding the nature of classification   2014.
           of various ICT solutions by the OECD, UN as well as the
           Harmonic  System  Nomenclature,  the  current  existing   [9] Ibid.
           analysis is an oversimplification of the actual ICT solutions
           provided by the companies and entities leading to a distortion   [10] Marie  Lamensch,  Edoardo  Traversa,  and  Servaas
           in the nature of taxation on the specific activities.[11] This   van  Thiel,  “Value  Added  Tax  and  the  Digital
           leads to a distortion or the wrongful levy of the GST and   Economy,” Kluwer Law International 2015.
           customs  duty  on  the  supply  of  the  ICT  solutions  which
           overlooks  the  exact  correct  characterisation  of  the  digital   [11] OECD,  “Consumption  Tax Aspects  of  Electronic
           supplies. Furthermore, the RCM standard for the collection   Commerce,” Report from Working Party No 9 on
           and disbursement of the revenue to the governments is based   Consumption,  Taxes  to  the  Committee  on  Fiscal
           on  the  principle  of  registration  and  self-assessment   Affairs, 2001.
           declaration  which  is  effective  with  the  large  scale  huge
           MNC’s  but  is  not  effective  with  the  small-scale  local   [12] Rifat Azam, “Cloudy with a Chance of Taxation,”
           suppliers who still rely on the Forward Charge Mechanisms   SMU Dedman School of Law Legal Studies, 22 Fla.
           (FCM) basis of taxation and availment of ITC. The proposal   Tax Rev. 500, 2019.
           of standardization in the form of collection of the tax and
           subsequent disbursement by the intermediaries remains to be   [13] Hongler, Peter “Blueprints for a New PE Nexus to
           explored by the governments across the globe.             Tax  Business  Income  in  the  Era  of  the  Digital
                                                                     Economy,”  WU  International  Taxation  Research,
                           11. REFERENCES                            2015.

               [1] World Bank; ITU. “Measuring the Emissions and
                  Energy Footprint of the ICT Sector: Implications





                                                          – 207 –
   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256