Page 127 - ITUJournal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 1
P. 127

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 1




          9.12 Proof of Proposition 10                         [11] A. Garnaev, A. Petropulu, W. Trappe, and H.V Poor.
                                                                     “A Power Control Game with Uncertainty On the
          First note that procedure Ω(  ) re lects the bisection     Type of the Jammer”. In: Proc. IEEE Global Confer‑
          method to solve equation   (  ,   ) =    for a  ixed   .   ence on Signal and Information Processing (Global‑
          By Proposition 2, this procedure converges. Procedure      SIP). 2019.
          Strategies() re lects the bisection method to solve equa‑
          tion ̃   (Ω(  ),   )−     = 0. By Proposition 3, this procedure  [12] N. Namvar, W. Saad, N. Bahadori, and B. Kel‑
          also converges. Thus, Algorithm 1 converges as a super‑    leys. “Jamming in the Internet of Things: A Game‑
          position of two converging procedures.                     Theoretic Perspective”. In: Proc. IEEE Global Com‑
                                                                     munications Conference (GLOBECOM). 2016.
                                                               [13] Y. Wu, B. Wang, and K.J.R Liu. “Optimal power allo‑
          REFERENCES                                                 cation strategy against jamming attacks using the

           [1] S. Vadlamania, B. Eksioglub, H. Medala, and A. Nan‑   Colonel Blotto game”. In: Proc. IEEE Global Telecom‑
               dia. “Jamming attacks on wireless networks: A tax‑    munications Conference (GLOBECOM). 2009, pp. 1–
               onomic survey”. In: International Journal of Produc‑  5.
               tion Economics 172 (2016), pp. 76–94.           [14] G.D Nguyen, S. Kompella, C. Kam, J.E Wieselth‑
                                                                     ier, and A. Ephremides. “Wireless link connectiv‑
           [2] Z. Han, D. Niyato, W. Saad, T. Basar, and A.
               Hjrungnes. Game Theory in Wireless and Communi‑       ity under hostile interference: Nash and Stackel‑
               cation Networks: Theory, Models, and Applications.    berg equilibria”. In: Proc. 14th International Sym‑
               Cambridge University Press, 2012.                     posium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad
                                                                     Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt). 2016.
           [3] D. Yang, G. Xue, J. Zhang, A. Richa, and X. Fang. “Cop‑
               ing with a Smart Jammer in Wireless Networks: A  [15] G.D Nguyen, S. Kompella, C. Kam, J.E Wieselthier,
               Stackelberg Game Approach”. In: IEEE Transactions     and A. Ephremides. “Impact of Hostile Interference
               on Wireless Communications 12 (2013), pp. 4038–       on Wireless Link Connectivity”. In: IEEE Trans‑
               4047.                                                 actions on Control of Network Systems 5 (2018),
                                                                     pp. 1445–1456.
           [4] A. Garnaev, A. Petropulu, W. Trappe, and H.V Poor.  [16] R. El‑Bardan, S. Brahma, and P.K Varshney. “Power
               “A Jamming Game with Rival‑Type Uncertainty”. In:     control with jammer location uncertainty: A game
               IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communication 19        theoretic perspective”. In: Proc. 48th Annual Con‑
               (2020), pp. 5359–5372.
                                                                     ference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS).
           [5] F.M Aziz, J.S Shamma, and G.L Stuber. “Jammer‑type    2014, pp. 1–6.
               estimation in LTE with a smart jammer repeated  [17] A. Garnaev and W. Trappe. “Stability of commu‑
               game”. In: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technol‑    nication link connectivity against hostile interfer‑
               ogy 66 (2017), pp. 7422–7431.
                                                                     ence”. In: Proc. IEEE Global Conference on Signal
           [6] T. Song, W.E Stark, T. Li, and J.K Tugnait. “Opti‑    and Information Processing (GlobalSIP). 2017.
               mal Multiband Transmission Under Hostile Jam‑   [18] M. Hajimirsaadeghi and N.B Mandayam. “A dy‑
               ming”. In: IEEE Transactions on Communications 64     namic Colonel Blotto game model for spectrum
               (2016), pp. 4013–4027.
                                                                     sharing in wireless networks”. In: Proc. 55th An‑
           [7] L. Xiao, D. Jiang, D. Xu, H. Zhu, Y. Zhang, and       nual Allerton Conference on Communication, Con‑
               H.V Poor. “Two‑Dimensional Antijamming Mobile         trol, and Computing (Allerton). 2017, pp. 287–294.
               Communication Based on Reinforcement Learn‑     [19] M. Labib, S. Ha, W. Saad, and J.H Reed. “A Colonel
               ing”. In: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology   Blotto Game for Anti‑Jamming in the Internet of
               67 (2018), pp. 9499–9512.
                                                                     Things”. In: Proc. IEEE Global Communications Con‑
           [8] N. Abuzainab and W. Saad. “Dynamic Connectiv‑         ference (GLOBECOM). 2015, pp. 1–6.
               ity Game for Adversarial Internet of Battle ield  [20] C. Guo, Y. Zhang, M. Sheng, Wang X, and Y. Li. “  ‑Fair
               Things Systems”. In: IEEE Internet of Things Journal  Power Allocation in Spectrum‑Sharing Networks”.
               5 (2018), pp. 378–390.                                In: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 65
           [9] Y. Gao, Y. Xiao, M. Wu, M. Xiao, and J. Shao.         (2016), pp. 3771–3777.
               “Game Theory‑Based Anti‑Jamming Strategies for  [21] E. Altman, K. Avrachenkov, and A. Garnaev. “Fair
               Frequency Hopping Wireless Communications”. In:       Resource Allocation in Wireless Networks in the
               IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 17       Presence of a Jammer”. In: Performance Evaluation
               (2018), pp. 5314–5326.                                67 (2010), pp. 338–349.
          [10] A. Garnaev, A. Petropulu, W. Trappe, and H.V Poor.  [22] E. Altman, K. Avrachenkov, and A. Garnaev. “Closed
               “A Muli‑Jammer Game with Latency as the User’s        Form Solutions for Water‑Filling Problem in Opti‑
               Communication Utility”. In: IEEE Communications       mization and Game Frameworks”. In: Telecommu‑
               Letters 24 (2020), pp. 1899–1903.                     nication Systems Journal 47 (2011), pp. 153–164.





                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2021                   111
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132