Page 27 - ITU Journal Future and evolving technologies Volume 2 (2021), Issue 6 – Wireless communication systems in beyond 5G era
P. 27

ITU Journal on Future and Evolving Technologies, Volume 2 (2021), Issue 6




          data rates to 1 Tbit s −1   is something that end users will   for compression techniques, which can avoid the need for
          surely welcome but not at an augmented price, since it is   the envisioned transmission rates.
          not a prominent need. An increase in data rate without 6G   Regarding latency, end‐to‐end latency consists of the sum
          would still be possible, since, as discussed in [87], 5G has   of various contributions [91], [92]. The propagation la‑
          already  foreseen  the  inclusion  of  higher  frequencies  up   tency is the physical distance between communication en‐
          to 60 GHz.  Thus, covering higher frequencies would not   tities. This is physically bounded by the speed of light and
          necessarily require the huge additional investments for a   can only be reduced via techniques that somehow ’vir‐
          new 6th generation in order to get additional very broad   tually’ shorten the real communication distance such as
          bandwidth with frequencies reaching 1 −3 THz. Further‐  MEC. Next, transmission latency depends on the inverse
          more,  the  targeted  data  rate  of  5G  set  to  1 −10 Gbit s −1   of the available capacity on the communication link. The
          can be enough for the satisfaction of many possible ver‐  queuing latency comes from the scheduling of data trans‐
          ticals  already  envisioned  or  to  come.  For  example,  the   missions (e.g. prioritisation) and routing. In a network
          initial  requirements  estimated  for  3D  holographic  com‐  ecosystem, where softwarization makes in‐network com‐
          munications  [40],  and  implicitly  for  the  digital  twin,  of   puting the pillar of any network functionality, the pro‐
          4.32 Tbit s −1  are for raw data. This quantity could signi i‐  cessing is a key aspect. Thus, the processing latency is
          cantly be reduced with advanced data compression tech‐  the delay, which depends on the hardware’s processing
          niques that could be researched.  This means that more   capacity of network nodes.
            icient  and  effective  methodologies  to  compress  data
          could avoid the usage of unnecessary spectrum and un‐  By considering that 6G will be a fully‐intelligent network,
          necessary investments by the operators. In this direction,   another latency variable jumps into the calculation of
          recent works have been exploring the potential of Seman‑   end‐to‐end latency. We may call it intelligence latency. By
          tic  Communications  [88]  to  achieve  maximum  compres‐  considering the complete deployment and integration of
          sion of data while ensuring the correct accomplishment   AI into the communication network management and op‐
          of identi ied tasks between interacting entities.    erations, it is important to notice that a new paradigm
                                                               arises, also bringing with it its own cons: big data. In fact,
          Moreover, since the advent of 4G services, network traf ic
                                                               intelligence requires continuous big data collection, pre‐
          has been drifting from mainly downlink to uplink intense   processing and analysis performed in a distributed man‐
          usage, because of various new bandwidth‐intensive appli‐
                                                               ner by various data centres within the whole network.
          cations [89]. Representative examples of services driving
                                                               This means an explosion of the control traf ic, which can
          to  such  a  paradigm  shift  in  cellular  networks  are  video
                                                               become comparable to the amount of data traf ic sent
          sharing, real‐time MEC of loading support, cloud backup,
                                                               across the network. This means that a 6G intelligent con‐
          massive IoT data gathering, etc.  With 5G we are already
                                                               trol plane [93] will require time not only for distributed
          experiencing such dramatic inversion of the direction of
                                                               data mining and classi ication but also for training, decid‐
            ic.  With 6G, many of the new types of services will
                                                               ing, and acting on the network environment (we do not
          even push the network usage to higher imbalances, with   consider now the delay for the network recon iguration
          much more uplink traf ic in many scenarios and use cases.
                                                               after the intelligent algorithm has acted). In this context,
                                                               the use of proactive ML algorithms may help to make la‐
          Each  UE  connected  to  the  network  implies  a  speci ic
          amount of processing load required at the BBU. The pro‐  tency ultra‐low [94] or ’negative’ [95]. This paradigm is
          cessing  required  by  a  UE  for  the  uplink  in  4G  was  ex‐  the so‐called ’anticipatory networking’. The two terms of
          pressed in [90] as                                   this paradigm [96] include anticipation, the exploitation
                                                               of prediction techniques or the assumption of given fu‐
                                     1                         ture knowledge, and networking, the optimisation of mo‐
                                  2
                             = (3   +    +       )  10  (1)    bile communications. However, anticipatory networking
                                     3
                                                               is somehow incompatible with targeting null failure be‐
          where    is the number of antennas,    the modulation  cause prediction (and so ML algorithms) is not determin‐
          bits,    the code rate,    the number of spatial MIMO‐layers  istic and it has a variable accuracy (with probability al‐
          and    the number of Physical Resource Block (PRB). The  ways less than 1), whose quality also strictly depends on
          processing load          is measured in Giga‐Operations Per  the data previously collected.
          Second (GOPS). Even if de ined for 4G, Eq. ((1)) can give
          us an idea of the impact that requirements and trends of  Finally, softwarization implies the deployment of virtual
          6G previously mentioned can have on computing, latency,  machines and containers. It is well‐known that the com‐
          and energy usage. A data rate in the order of Tbit s −1  plete and massive use of software is not as ef icient as
          increases the value of    as the number of MIMO anten‐  the hardware‐based solutions [1], [97]. This means that
          nas that 6G is planning to use augments   . For example,  the open challenge of matching 5G latency requirements
          in [73], it is envisioned the employment of 1024×1024  with softwarization will be physically quite hard, espe‐
          MIMO elements. This means that the data rate will highly  cially when targeting the extreme range of values less
          increase computing, which will increase the overall la‐  than 1 ms with 6G. Additionally, the explosion of the data
          tency and energy usage. This concern underlines the need  rate to 1 Tbit s −1  will probably make impossible the re‐





                                             © International Telecommunication Union, 2021                    15
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32