Page 189 - ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services – Technology, innovation and competition
P. 189

ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services
                                              Technology, Innovation and Competition



               A true enabling environment is said to exist when banks and non-banks are allowed to undertake almost equal
               market activities on almost equal terms  using a functional and proportional approach that reflects the risk
                                                 53
               profile of the service being offered,  rather than being based on the type of provider. 55
                                             54
               The lack of legislation, such as a national payment systems act and associated regulations, is not necessarily
               a handicap to non-banks being allowed market access: A central bank, and often the telecommunications
               regulator, may issue a letter of no objection (LONO) in advance of, or in the absence of an adopted regulatory
               framework. However, if the terms are not transparent and applied uniformly amongst market participants,
               this may result in certain entities being favored and subject to privileged terms.

               4.2    Competition aspects

               Consent by a regulator for an entity to enter a market is ground zero for the facilitation of a robust competition
               in a market. Without the consent, certain entities may be left to only provide ancillary services. And even where
               some participation is allowed from non-bank entities, there may be sectoral complaints.

               Consent by a regulator for variety of entities to enter a market is precondition for robust competition in the
               market for DFS. Without the consent, new innovative providers will not be able to deliver DFS services at
               scale  and certain entities may be left to only provide ancillary services. And even where some participation
                   56
               is allowed from non-bank entities, there may be sectoral complaints.


               4.3    Country examples

               Bangladesh

               Under the ‘Mobile Financial Services Guideline 2011’ issued by Bangladesh Bank (BB), only banks or their
               subsidiaries are eligible for a DFS license. Neither MNOs nor other non-banks can legally independently operate
               in the DFS ecosystem in Bangladesh, although non-banks can be investors in bank subsidiaries.  So far BB has
                                                                                              57
               not approved DFS licenses for bank subsidiaries that have MNOs as shareholders.
               This regulatory situation has brought about a virtual monopoly in the DFS market, dominated by the DFS
               Service Provider (SP) bKash which holds over 90 per cent of the market share, even though 18 banks operate
               DFS.  There are 28 commercial banks with MFS licenses, but only three or four are effectively operating in
                   58
               the market.  The consequence of this lack of competition is seen as having created a situation of insufficient
                         59
               investment and innovation in the DFS market.  60






               53   ibid
               54   This is akin to similar treatment of similarly placed entities to avoid any competition concerns. However, there might be instances
                  of similar treatment of dissimilar entities resulting in competition concerns.
               55   The GSMA definition of an enabling environment includes non-banks, including MNOs or their subsidiaries being able to offer
                  electronic money services; that they are able to use a network of third party agents to cash-in/out and register clients; and that
                  there is a market led approach to interoperability. See di Castri (2013) ibid.
               56   From an impact perspective, large-scale quantitative analysis on the success factors for Mobile Money demonstrates that MNO-
                  Led MM deployments have been more successful in developing and delivering DFS: MNOs obtain an average of almost 45,000
                  active accounts within a year of launch – 60% higher than for non-MNOs. By the 5th year of launch, this difference grows to
                  almost four-fold. See GSMA (2016) Success Factors For Mobile Money Services: A Quantitative Assessment Of Success Factors ,
                  available at https:// goo. gl/ epIufJ
               57   ADB (2016) Digital Payment Systems, Mobile Money Services and Agent Banking: Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka, available at
                  https:// goo. gl/ KRZwyt .
               58   Between bKash and DBBL they have 95 per cent market share. See Dhaka Tribune (2015a) Bangladesh Bank’s Nuclear Option,
                  available at https:// goo. gl/ BVxvBT .
               59   Ibid.
               60   A recently published report by the Better Than Cash Alliance (BTCA) recommends improving the regulatory environment to
                  achieve more competition in the DFS market. See BTCA (2016) Building Digital Bangladesh: The Way Forward for Digitizing Pay-
                  ments, available at https:// goo. gl/ FnIN8t .



                                                                                                       165
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194