Page 84 - ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services – Recommendations
P. 84

ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services
                                                      Recommendations







                Title of recommendation       Informing consumers of their right to complain and how to do so
                Working Group                 Consumer Experience and Protection

                Theme                         Recourse
                Audience for recommendation   Regulators





                Regulators should require that DFS providers inform consumers through multiple channels (e.g., print, SMS,
                etc.) of their right to complain and the process to complain, including all external complaints, filing options, and
                procedures in the event that the consumer is not satisfied with the outcome of the recourse process with the
                provider (e.g. regulators, ombudsman, industry mediator, consumer advocacy body, or the judiciary).


               Regulators should require providers to use multiple channels to provide information on recourse, such as
               in written contracts, pre-contractual disclosures, electronic and print media, statements and receipts, and
               posted notices at branches and agents. GSMA’s Code of Conduct for Mobile Money Providers  states that
                                                                                               18
               mobile money providers should, “inform customers of the existance of complaint policies and procedures.”
               Some countries, such as Armenia , require staff to provide this information verbally, recognizing that illiterate
                                           42
               customers will be unable to read written materials. Depending on the nature of the product, SMS may be an
               effective way to provide this notification.

               Customers who interact primarily or exclusively with an agent may not know how to contact the DFS provider
               directly (e.g., at a call center or branch office) or feel confident doing so and thus first go to agents for
                                        42
               assistance. According to CGAP  research, agents may not always be adequately trained or incentivized to serve
               in the dispute resolution role. Further, where the dispute or issue regards the agent itself, this can create serious
               problems. For this reason, signage, brochures, and other materials that provide clear instructions on contacting
               the DFS provider with a complaint or concern should be prominently displayed at the agent’s location.

               In situations where internal recourse fails, providers should specify how disputes can be resolved, as stated
               in Principle 7 of the GSMA’s Code of Conduct . For example, if the result of the investigation regarding the
                                                      18
               complaint is not in the customer’s favor, the customer should be advised of available third-party alternative
               dispute resolution (ADR) options. Such alternatives may include an external ombudsman, mediator, consumer
               advocacy body, or judiciary. Regulators should do all in their authority to require providers to conduct internal
               recourse well, even though dealing with complaints can present a significant burden, particularly to low-
               capacity regulators.

               In countries where an appeal to the court system is not financially or logistically feasible for low-income
               or illiterate customers, alternatives should be provided. The AFI recommends  that a consumer generally
                                                                                  12
               should not be expected to visit multiple third parties to seek redress when the DFS provider did not resolve a
               complaint to the customer’s satisfaction; instead sufficient, appropriate options should be available so that a
               consumer only needs to visit one. Indonesia, for example, provides a single point of contact for customer care
               and referral to the correct governmental ombudsman. South Africa is also working to have a single contact
               for its multiple ombudsman schemes.

               Banco Central do Brasil  requires financial institutions to disclose the existence of internal complaints
                                    43
               mechanisms, and how to access them, at the distribution channels. Access to internal complaints must be
               freely available through effective channels, including: a hotline that should be disclosed at branches; agents;




               42   Central Bank of the Republic of Armenia, Board Resolution 229-N (2009) https:// www. cba. am/ EN/ laregulations/ Regulation%208
                  _05_ eng. pdf
               43   Banco Central Do Brasil Resolucao No 4.433, DE 23 DE Julho De 2015 http:// www. bcb. gov. br/ pre/ normativos/ busca/
                  downloadNormativo. asp? arquivo=/ Lists/ Normativos/ Attachments/ 48509/ Res_ 4433_ v1_ O. pdf



                78
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89