Page 31 - ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services – Recommendations
P. 31

ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services
                                                      Recommendations







                Title of recommendation       Access point interoperability
                Working Group                 Interoperability

                Audience for recommendation   Authorities and DFS providers




                Access point interoperability should be encouraged and implemented. A common interoperability brand at
                access point level, such as agent, POS, or ATM, may ensure customer awareness of access point interoperability.
                Effective interoperability of agents by initiating transactions via the agent account to any transaction account
                should be aimed for to expand the effective size of service points/access channel networks.

               Close proximity to bank branches, mobile money agents other points of access and channels is, generally,
               insufficient if there is limited or no interoperability between those points of access. In fact, at present, most
               innovative payment solutions are based on proprietary payment schemes that are not interoperable and as
               such can only be used at a limited number of access points.
               The usefulness of transaction accounts is augmented with a broad network of access points that also
               achieves wide geographical coverage, and by offering a variety of interoperable access channels. The
               consequences of low interoperability are overlapping or limited coverage, sunken investment costs and
               inefficiency. For example, a proprietary payments infrastructure, such as a bank’s own ATM or POS network
               that is not interoperable with other similar networks has limited impact on financial inclusion due to its limited
               network size.

               Interoperability can play a critical role in expanding the effective size of service points/access channel
               networks. In contrast, exclusivity agreements limit the interoperability of service/access points that are
               otherwise interoperable. Non-exclusive agent arrangements promote competition within the ecosystem
               between DFS providers for both customers and agents.
               If agent accounts can be used to initiate transactions to transaction accounts in other interoperable
               schemes, this could result in agent level interoperability without the need for the agent to open accounts
               in different schemes. The user of one mobile money scheme could cash-in at the agent of another mobile
               money scheme and the agent in turn transfers the corresponding amount from its mobile money account to
               the user’s mobile money account at the other (interoperable) scheme.

               Despite many markets having mandated non-exclusive agency arrangements, exclusive arrangements
               continue in practice. It is therefore important to implement cost effective mechanisms to monitor compliance.





























                                                                                                       25
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36