Page 197 - The Digital Financial Services (DFS) Ecosystem
P. 197

ITU-T Focus Group Digital Financial Services
                                                         Ecosystem



               Figure 11 – EcoCash Merchant Acceptance






































               While Steward’s POS device enables interoperability of payment types and mobile wallets at the POI, the bank
               is primarily focused on card-based merchant payments. Their role as BIN sponsor for EcoCash’s companion
               debit card was driven by its desire to be connected to the card network’s open loop system and its connection
               to ACI Worldwide switch enables acceptance from other banking platforms.  While the Easypaisa network also
                                                                             17
               offers a companion card, its bank, Tameer Microfinance Bank, does not yet perform the merchant acquiring
               functions done by Steward Bank. Furthermore, its companion card is an ATM card linked to the national ID
               scheme, not yet allowing purchases at merchant locations. In many ways, EcoCash is moving towards greater
               operational standardization and its approach to merchant acquiring allows it to focus on creating scale while
               complementing other banking services. Finally, similar to the MSP model, market forces may drive merchant
               acquirers to work more closely with Payment Facilitators.


               8.4    Conclusion and Next Steps
               This chapter has identified three models currently being leveraged by MMOs to drive merchant acceptance.
               By identifying and detailing these models we have attempted to create a foundation for better understanding
               how eMoney deployments are driving nascent merchant acceptance and lessons learned. These models can
               be expanded to other deployments to create a robust evidence base. Furthermore, initial learnings can help
               to inform decision about critical paths. Nevertheless, additional work is warranted to improve our baseline
               understanding as well as provide for the on-going monitoring of new and existing deployments.

               The In-House model, while successful, appears to be a response to unique market circumstances. In the
               case of ZAAD as a mechanism for protecting against hyperinflation. In the case of M-PESA Kenya, a result of
               Safaricom’s dominant market position. Both situations are uncommon and present barriers to the ability to
               scale this model. The in-house model does not provide a robust path to scale because it is difficult without
               with a dominant market player to create the necessary network effect in house to create compelling value
               for merchant acceptance.




               17   MasterCard Representative. Phone Interview. 12 Nov 2015



                                                                                                       169
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202