Page 145 - ITU Kaleidoscope 2016
P. 145

ICTs for a Sustainable World








          Table 4. Stretch: Analysis vs. Simulation with α =0.7
          and Chunk Size 10MB.
             Cache Size  Chunk   Anal   Sim  Difference
                             2
                 1       1(10 )  0.56  0.58     0.02
                             2
                 2       2(10 )  0.51  0.54     0.03
                             2
                 3       3(10 )  0.50  0.53     0.03
                             2
                 4       4(10 )  0.49  0.52     0.03
                             2
                 5       5(10 )  0.48  0.50     0.02
                             2
                 6       6(10 )  0.47  0.49     0.02
                             2
                 7       7(10 )  0.46  0.48     0.02
                             2
                 8       8(10 )  0.45  0.47     0.02
                             2
                 9       9(10 )  0.44  0.46     0.02        Figure 4. Result on GEANT topology
                             2
                 10     10(10 )  0.43  0.44     0.01
          Table 5. Stretch: Analysis vs. Simulation with α =1.0
          and Chunk Size 10MB.
             Cache Size  Chunk   Anal   Sim  Difference
                             2
                 1       1(10 )  0.51  0.54     0.03
                             2
                 2       2(10 )  0.47  0.52     0.05
                             2
                 3       3(10 )  0.43  0.48     0.05
                             2
                 4       4(10 )  0.39  0.44     0.05
                             2
                 5       5(10 )  0.35  0.40     0.05
                             2
                 6       6(10 )  0.31  0.36     0.05
                             2
                 7       7(10 )  0.27  0.32     0.05
                             2
                 8       8(10 )  0.23  0.28     0.05        Figure 5. Result on DTelekom topology
                             2
                 9       9(10 )  0.19  0.24     0.05
                             2
                 10     10(10 )  0.15  0.20     0.05
                                                            with popularity value of 0.7. However, with the increase of
                                                            popularity model, the hit ratio reached 45% with α = 1.0
               6. TOPOLOGICAL EFFECT ON RESULTS
                                                            in CPCE as compared to 38% of Betweenness-Centrality
                                                            and 36% of CEE. Similarly, on the DTelekom topology, the
          Topology has a direct impact on the simulation results [48]
                                                            achieved simulated results for α=0.7 were as follows: CEE
          and according to the ICN baseline scenarios [49,50], there is
                                                            = 22%, Betweenness-Centrality = 19%, and CPCE = 25%.
          no general agreement on the topology selection. Therefore,
                                                            While with the increase of popularity model, the hit ratio
          for a fair evaluation, apart from the GEANT topology, we have
                                                            reached 54% with α = 1.0 in CPCE as compared to 49%
          also simulated all the strategies on the DTelekom topology.  of Betweenness-Centrality and 48% of CEE. In all figures,
          To evaluate the performance of ICN caching, we believe that
                                                            Betweenness-Centrality is represented by Centrality.
          cache hit and stretch ratio are considered the most prominent
          metrics because cache hit combines the properties of other
          metrics, such as content eviction rate, cached element rate, and
          cached miss rate, while the stretch ratio also affects the hop
          decrement as well as the content retrieval delay. Therefore,  6.2. Stretch on GEANT and DTelekom
          we present the simulation results for cache hit and stretch ratio
          on the mentioned two topologies in the following subsections.
                                                            Figure 4(c,d) and Figure 5(c,d) show the stretch ratio exhib-
                                                            ited by CEE, Betweenness-Centrality, and CPCE on GEANT
          6.1. Cache Hit on GEANT and DTelekom              and DTelekom topologies, respectively. The stretch was al-
                                                            most the same for all strategies with low popularity model
          Figure 4(a,b) and Figure 5(a,b) represent the cache hit ratio  and lower cache size on DTelekom topology, however, there
          on GEANT and DTelekom topologies, respectively. In a low  was some difference on the GEANT topology. When the pop-
          popularity scenario, i.e., when α is 0.7, the ratio of cache hit  ularity model α was increased from 0.7 to 1.0, the recorded
          is low on both GEANT and DTelekom topologies with cache  stretch ratio was as follows: on the GEANT topology it ws
          sizes 1GB to 10GB, but with the increase of cache size as  64%-30% in CEE with cache size 1GB-10 GB, 60%-32% in
          well as the increase of popularity value, i.e., α=1.0, a higher  Betweenness-Centrality, and 54%-20% in CPCE. While on
          hit ratio was achieved. On the other hand and for the GEANT  the DTelekom topology the recorded stretch with the same
          topology, the recorded hit ratio was 15%, 16%, and 18%  parameters was as follows: CEE = 47%-20%, Betweenness-
          for CEE, Betweenness-Centrality, and CPCE, respectively,  Centrality = 52%-25%, and CPCE = 50%-14%, respectively.


                                                          – 127 –
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150