Page 77 - Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2016
P. 77

Figure 2.1: A cost-savings comparison of different types of sharing

                                                       Cost savings from ... 2-way sharing  3-way sharing           Chapter 2
                                                                      Brownfields  Greenfields  Greenfields
                           Sharing of towers and physical sites
                                                                 Passive   <10%      10%    15%
                                                                 network
                           Sharing of antennas, power and air    sharing
                                    conditioning                           >15%     <20%    >20%


                                  National roaming               Single
                                                                 network   >30%     >30%    >40%

                                                                 Active
                              Full RAN sharing (single entity    network
                                    NetCo/ServCo)                sharing            >40%    >50%


               Source: GSM Association and Vodafone Group


                   Box 2.3: Fixed Network Co-Investment Examples

                   Netherlands: In an example of a commercially driven co-investment arrangement, the Dutch
                   incumbent operator KPN co-invested with Reggefiber to deploy FTTH connectivity to 2 million
                   homes. The initial arrangement was for KPN to pay 41 per cent, with Reggefiber funding 59 per
                   cent of the deployment cost . But in November 2014, KPN acquired 100 per cent of Reggefiber,
                                           7
                   effectively ending the co-investment arrangement .
                                                             8
                   Singapore: Singapore’s OpenNet is an example of how a government incentive was used to
                   effectively require a co-investment strategy. Singapore’s policy objective was to introduce a
                   structurally separate entity at the passive layer, so it forbade the fixed incumbent from having a
                   controlling stake in that entity . As a post-script, the co-investment arrangements were unwound
                                            9
                   in 2014, when all of the OpenNet shareholders, including the incumbent, sold their interests to
                   NetLink Trust, which was set up with the incumbent operator as the beneficiary .
                                                                                      10
                   Portugal: Vodafone Portugal and Optimus entered into a long-term cooperation agreement
                   calling for each operator to build next-generation access networks independently (mainly in the
                   Lisbon and Porto areas). The agreement spelled out conditions granting each operator access to
                   the other’s networks .
                                     11
                   France: In France, the regulator has mandated network sharing for in-building wiring. This has
                   led operators to grant a passive access to other operators at the concentration point . Under
                                                                                          12
                   the French model, one operator signs a contract with the building owner and becomes the main
                   operator within the building. This operator is in charge of constructing and maintaining the
                   networks and offering passive access to the other operators, either through a dedicated or shared
                   fibre line. Access is granted through a long-term (24- or 30-year) cooperation agreement.



               2.3.2   Network sharing in the fixed sector     The other main example of fixed-service co-
                                                               investment has been when non-incumbent
               Co-investment in fixed markets occurs relatively   competitors have agreed to co-invest in a new
               infrequently compared to mobile network         network without involving the incumbent. These
               sharing. It is especially rare to see co-investment   agreements, however, face the risk that the
               agreements for fixed infrastructure without some   incumbent will cherry-pick prime customers and
               pressure or incentive by a government.          otherwise compete aggressively wherever the




                                                                               Trends in Telecommunication Reform 2016  59
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82