964 ITU‐T's Technical Reports and Specifications Work area FG‐SSC delivera‐ble(s) related to this work area SDO working on this area Document number released by this SDO Corresponding document title Standardiza‐tion gap in this area Future needs and suggestions to SG5 E‐Government Integrated manage‐ment for SSC [ITU‐T TR man‐agement] ISO/IEC ISO/IEC 2382 Information technology – Vo‐cabulary – Part 1: Fundamen‐tal terms; Part 4: Organization of data; Part 5: Representation of data; Part 7: Computer pro‐gramming; Part 8: Security; Part 9: Data communication; Part 13: Computer graphics; Part 14: Reliability, maintaina‐bility and availability; Part 15: Programming languages; Part 16: Information theory; Part 17: Databases; Part 18: Dis‐tributed data processing; Part 20: System development; Part 23: Text processing; Part 24: Computer‐integrated manu‐facturing; Part 25: Local area networks; Part 26: Open sys‐tems interconnection; Part 27: Office automation; Part 28: Artificial intelligence – Basic concepts and expert systems; Part 29: Artificial intelligence‐Speech recognition and syn‐thesis; Part 31: Artificial intelli‐gence – Machine learning; Part 32: Electronic Mail; Part 34: Artificial intelligence‐Neural networks; Part 36: Learning, education and training Need to select the necessary vocabularies To develop guidelines for the services and applications of e‐government in SSC ISO/IEC 11179 Information technology – Metadata registries (MDR) – Part 1: Framework; Part 2: Classification; Part 3: Registry metamodel and basic attrib‐utes; Part 4: Formulation of data definitions; Part 5: Nam‐ing and identification princi‐ples; Part 6: Registration Can be refer‐enced for de‐veloping ser‐vice model of e‐government To develop a service model of e‐government for SSC ISO/IEC 14598 Information technology – Software product evaluation – Part 1: General overview; Part 2: Planning and manage‐ment; Part 3: Process for de‐velopers; Part 4: Process for acquirers; Part 5: Process for evaluators Can be referenced for developing service model of e‐government