ITU Telecom World 2009 In Review 2009 Geneva 5-9 October 2. An unrealistic expectation that the end-user is able, willing or aware enough to be responsible for the security of his/her own PC/Mac com-puter or mobile device, and therefore also of the network (e.g. botnets). 3. Divergent legal systems and laws relating to cyber-crime and cyber-se-curity; some countries have no laws relating to cyber-crime or cyber-security legislation while others have relatively advanced cyber-security frameworks. There will always be the challenge of dual criminality issues between legal systems but without, at a minimum, an international frame-work to “track and trace”, there is little hope of catching the criminals. 4. Virtually no consequences / sanctions impunity for cyber-criminals due to the difficulties inherent in implementing legal procedures within national borders for a crime committed in a borderless world (the internet). This is made particularly difficult when many countries do not have legislation in place that even recognizes cyber-crime as a crime. 5. The inability of some governments to cooperate fully due to national se-curity priorities. 6. The lack of reporting and monitoring of cyber-crimes, malware and fraud on-line. 7. The challenge of balancing increased security with the principles of the Internet, which have made it such a success: freedom, chaos, a hotbed of new ideas…. 8. The challenge for developing countries to finance necessary cyber-secu-rity measures; without which the global system remains highly insecure. It was therefore noted that that there is an urgent need for a common global cyber-security platform integrating all stakeholders including national govern-ments, industry, CERTs, ISPs, Domain Name Registrars, ICANN, law enforce-ment, justice ministries, Interpol, Financial Action Task Force (FATF), Telcos, etc. 120 Forum Summary Report