AP30 – 124 – MOD 4.1.25 Where an administration already having included in the List two assignments (not including those systems notified on behalf of a group of named administrations and included in the List by WRC-2000), in the same channel and covering the same service area, proposes to include in the List a new assignment in the same channel over this same service area, it shall apply the following in respect of another administration which has no assignment in the List in the same channel and which proposes to include in the List a new assignment: a) if the agreement of the former administration is required following the application of § 4.1 by the latter administration, in order to protect the new assignment proposed by the former administration from interference caused by the assignment proposed by the latter administration, both administrations shall make every possible effort to resolve the difficulties by means of mutually acceptable adjustments to their networks; b) in case of continuing disagreement, and if the former administration has not communicated to the Bureau the information specified in Annex 2 to Resolution 49 (Rev.WRC-15), this administration shall be deemed to have given its agreement to inclusion in the List of the assignment of the latter administration. (WRC-15) 4.2 Provisions applicable to Region 2 MOD 4.2.6bis The regulatory time-limit for bringing into use of an assignment in the Region 2 Plan obtained through application of § 4.2 may be extended once by not more than three years due to launch failure in the following cases: – the destruction of the satellite intended to bring the assignment into use; – the destruction of the satellite launched to replace an already operating satellite which is intended to be relocated to bring another assignment into use; or – the satellite is launched, but fails to reach its assigned orbital location. For this extension to be granted, the launch failure must have occurred at least five years after the date of receipt of the complete Appendix 4 data. In no case shall the period of the extension of the regulatory time-limit exceed the difference in time between the three-year period and the period remaining from the date of the launch failure to the end of the regulatory time-limit15. In order to take advantage of this extension, the administration shall have, within one month of the launch failure or one month after 5 July 2003, whichever comes later, notified the Bureau in writing of such failure, and shall also provide the following information to the Bureau before the end of the regulatory time-limit of § 4.2.6: – date of launch failure; – due diligence information as required in Resolution 49 (Rev.WRC-15) for the assignment with respect to the satellite that suffered the launch failure, if that information has not already been provided. If, 11 months after the request for extension, the administration has not provided to the Bureau updated Resolution 49 (Rev.WRC-15) information, the Bureau shall promptly send a reminder to the notifying administration. If, within one year of the request for extension, the administration has not provided to the Bureau updated Resolution 49 (Rev.WRC-15)information for the new satellite under procurement, the related frequency assignments shall lapse. (WRC-15)