Measuring the Information Society 2011 \" (% % 0 ),1 2 , 3 2, ),1 2 $ 4) $\" ( +L % % # ,( 3# F5)7% , \"0 $ % % * ( + \" ( $ $ # ( $ \" 8 + ,(($# /($)( +( $ ( % # %$( %% % % $ , % () , \" $3# %% % * + <)* \" +,@/$ # %% % %, # 86 ).\"( (( \" # 5* 3 ((\"($ # % % % ( +,((( \" (%# ( ( $ 86% % )# ,* ( +' +( 86%% % % ( % $ ,(((\"(\"(($ # # $ \" \" ( \"( \" L\"# ( \"+) (( 43$($ =@($> ( + $ )( + % (( $ =17$ \" ( $ # ' $ , @ $ $ ( % 17 . $ ' $, $+> ( +% + L # ( = , %>) , ( ( $ (5% 6=# (0 >)! (( ( ,%% % \" $+ ( +, $ ( # ,$ ( /$ ( # 1) Most dynamic countries ($ (( (($5$ # =%(# 1 > \"+ %+ $ )! ( $ , ( , % # $ \" ( \" 8 $ \" # ## $ 3)( # # #+(O+ P 5 2 (( \"( \" 5 3 \" 5 %(% =%)0>)( 3 3 ( ,(\"(\"(( 3+$ # 8%$ ( ( \";% \"5 () (O$ P( =:\" )0> ( , ( \"% 1 , (# ( (5# ( ) Table 2.3: Most dynamic countries (top ten) – changes between IDI 2010 and 2008 Change in IDI ranking Change in IDI value (absolute) Change in IDI value (%) IDI 2010 rank IDI rank change 2008-2010 IDI 2010 rank IDI value change 2008-2010 IDI 2010 rank IDI % change 2008-2010 Country Country Country 72 Armenia 14 46 Saudi Arabia 1.29 72 Armenia 31 90 Morocco 10 44 Qatar 1.11 46 Saudi Arabia 31 81 Viet Nam 10 52 Belarus 1.08 115 Kenya 28 74 Azerbaijan 9 21 Macao, China 1.01 81 Viet Nam 28 46 Saudi Arabia 9 47 Russia 0.96 52 Belarus 28 77 Georgia 8 36 Cyprus 0.96 74 Azerbaijan 27 60 Oman 8 5 Finland 0.94 60 Oman 27 36 Cyprus 7 27 Portugal 0.94 90 Morocco 26 5 Finland 7 3 Iceland 0.94 57 Moldova 25 57 Moldova 7 60 Oman 0.93 44 Qatar 25 Source: ITU. 15