The Tampere Convention — a life-saving treaty
In Tampere, a city in Finland 200 km north of
Helsinki, 225 delegates from 75 countries gathered in June, 1998, for the
Intergovernmental Conference on Emergency Telecommunications. That landmark
meeting culminated in the adoption and signing of the Tampere Convention on
the Provision of Telecommunication Resources for Disaster Relief and Mitigation
and Relief Operations — the world’s first global treaty recognizing the
vital importance of communication technology in humanitarian crises. ITU was one
of the organizations at the forefront in drafting this life-saving treaty.
The Tampere Convention came into force on 8 January
2005, following its ratification by 30 States just two weeks after the massive
Indian Ocean tsunami in December 2004. It has been ratified by a total of
36 countries to date. The United Nations Secretary-General is the Depository of
the Convention.
Removing barriers to the deployment of telecommunication equipment
|

ITU/P. Kuivanen |
|
The Tampere Conference Centre, where the
treaty was born |
In many countries, laws and regulations still hamper — or, in
the worst case, prohibit — the timely arrival and deployment of
telecommunication equipment at disaster scenes. Local customs officials might be
stymied by restrictive import provisions, and humanitarian agencies left
struggling without access to even basic communications during search and rescue
operations.
The Tampere Convention seeks to expedite the use of
information and communication technologies (ICT) by emergency teams, by allowing
for the temporary waiving of national laws covering the importation, licensing
and use of communications equipment. It also assures legal immunity for aid
workers using emergency ICT systems in responding to disasters.
The treaty provides for improved disaster preparedness by
creating a mechanism for the sharing of information and best practice. In
addition, it sets out a clear framework for international cooperation, managed
by ITU through national focal points.
Almost ten years on, the Tampere Convention has become the
global foundation for effective ICT deployment in emergency relief efforts. The
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA), which
acts as the treaty’s global operational coordinator, notes that major
improvements have already been made in the area of disaster preparedness, with
many countries proactively establishing emergency response partnerships.
More work required
|
Even though telecommunications can save lives
following disasters, regulatory barriers can make it difficult to use
the necessary equipment. ITU was a driving force in drafting and
promoting the Tampere Convention. It calls on States to waive regulatory
barriers that impede the use of ICT. These barriers include licensing
requirements to use frequencies, restrictions on importing equipment,
and limits on the movement of humanitarian teams. |
However, experts agree that more work is urgently needed if
the enormous potential of ICT is to be put to best use. One important area is
radiocommunications. "To facilitate speedy authorization of radiocommunication-based
equipment in emergencies, we are encouraging national authorities to put rules
in place ahead of time, to facilitate the operation of equipment by visiting
personnel," said Fabio Leite, Deputy to the Director of ITU’s Radiocommunication
Bureau. "We also urge manufacturers to ensure that their radio and wireless
equipment conforms to ITU Recommendations, to avoid any chance of harmful
interference with other services in any country in which such equipment is
deployed," he added.
Regulatory reform is another area needing attention. "One of
the reasons more countries have not yet ratified the Tampere agreement is that
under-resourced nations lack the expertise needed to ascertain the impact of the
Convention on existing legislation, national rights and responsibilities," noted
Sami Al Basheer Al Morshid, Director of ITU’s Telecommunication Development
Bureau. To encourage more countries to ratify the treaty, the World
Telecommunication Development Conference in Doha in March 2006 took a decision
(Resolution 34) that will see ITU assume a more active role in supporting
national administrations in their work towards implementing the
Tampere Convention.
Resolution 34 focuses on the role of telecommunications and
ICT "in early warning and mitigation of disasters and humanitarian assistance".
In November 2006, the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference in Antalya took another
important decision in this area. Its Resolution 36 invites Member States "to
work towards their accession to the Tampere Convention as a matter of priority".
It also urges Member States that are parties to the Convention to take all
practical steps to apply the treaty, and to work closely with the Operational
Coordinator as provided for in Resolution 34 (Doha, 2006).
Grass-roots experience during the Indian Ocean tsunami in
2004 indicated that on-going support for countries that have ratified the
Convention might also be needed. "Problems relating to the import and operation
of telecommunication equipment persist in a number of countries, despite their
ratification of the Convention," said Chérif Ghaly, Chair of the United Nations
Working Group on Emergency Telecommunications (WGET). "We clearly need to step
up efforts to ensure that States are fully aware of the provisions of the
Convention and their role and responsibilities."
Nevertheless, significant advances have been made since the Convention was
first signed. Emergency response partnerships are firmly in place, well ahead of
any disaster. "We can now rely on clear stand-by arrangements, stockpiles of
critical telecommunication equipment, and international rosters of available
resources," said Mr Ghaly. "Since Tampere, we have even more tools at our
disposal to minimize the impact of natural disasters. We need to take advantage
of this by establishing early-warning systems, adopting shared information
systems such as the Common Alerting Protocol, and implementing technologies best
adapted to disaster response, such as geospatial technologies, satellite imaging
and satellite communications."
|