A review of trends and an analysis of gaps and promising practices*
Findings |
 |
|
Financing ICT infrastructure and access
Stimulated by the technological dynamism and profitability in the
industry and opening up of markets, since the early 1990s, the international
private sector has quickly become the dominant player in infrastructure
investment, and has catalyzed rapid growth of the sector in developing
countries.
The opening of markets and privatization of national telecommunication
operators has led to an influx of tens of billions of US dollars into the
information and communication technology (ICT) sector across many developing
country markets. This has allowed access to fixed and mobile telephones,
computers, the Internet, and other ICTs for over a billion people in the space
of fifteen years. Initially, the vast majority of this investment came from
companies and institutional investors in the industrialized “North”, pursuing
expanded business and profit opportunities. The peak of “North-South”
international investment in the ICT sector was around 1999–2000. Then came the
“crash” of the global telecommunication industry and the bursting of the
“dotcom” bubble, resulting in much lower levels of new ICT investments in the
developing world. But the “crash” and “ bursting” aside, many major investments
(for example, major operator privatizations and mobile phone licences) were
already completed by 2000, and market capitalizations of key international
technology companies and investment portfolios were drastically lower. Recent
trends suggest that foreign direct investment (FDI) is again increasing. And
there remain numerous opportunities for foreign investors in developing-country
ICT infrastructure markets.
While private sector investment and financing in the ICT sector remains
high as evidenced by the continuing and rapid rollout in infrastructure,
particularly in mobile telephony, there has been a shift in the nature of that
investment towards domestic, regional and South-South financing and investment.
New investments by some of the major developing countries, such as Brazil,
China, India, Malaysia and South Africa, and regional players combined with
increasing reinvestment of existing operators, has continued to spur growth
throughout the ICT sector, at rates that greatly exceed those in the developed
world. Domestic companies, often financed by rapidly growing local financial and
capital markets have been important in facilitating the growth of this sector
in many countries.
New ICT investments in developing countries are also being stimulated
by a variety of domestic financial mechanisms and multi-stakeholder
partnerships….
Promising trends to build the domestic ICT sector in developing countries is
also found to be dependent upon partnerships and cooperation between public,
private, civil society organizations, community and financial stakeholders.
These partnerships and investments have helped to mitigate risks, demonstrate
market potential, enhance capacity and stimulate demand for ICT. The support and
development of local financial and capital markets, including capacity in new
areas such as venture capital are also helping to spur entrepreneurship and
innovation.
National universal service/access fund and other mechanisms to lower
costs of delivery to under-served markets and promote community access can play
an important role in helping to address ICT access gaps, but require
substantial institutional and implementation capacity to succeed.
More than sixty countries have begun to establish universal access funding
mechanisms as a core component of their ICT development policies, to bring
together financial resources in support of extending access beyond the market
frontier. Successful models of universal service/access fund introduced in Latin
America and elsewhere have indicated that, when properly implemented in a
competitive environment, these mechanisms can play a critical role in leveraging
market forces to expand access to public telephone service, multi-purpose
community telecentres and other ICT facilities.
Experience to date is mixed as
this trend is very new in much of the developing world, and most countries are
just beginning to address policy, regulatory, governance, institutional and
capacity issues required for successful management of these funds. There are
also possibilities for scaling up these funds through innovative financial
mechanisms and schemes. Periodic assessment and evaluation of these mechanisms,
together with other universal access development programmes, can help define
their future role in the sector within many countries.
Regional cooperation, multi-stakeholder partnerships, and seed
financing appear to be critical elements for addressing critical infrastructure
gaps and can in turn help promote further development of national backbones and
last mile solutions in countries where gaps persist.
In countries with relatively low population density and low per capita
incomes (for example, some of Africa’s under-served subregions and Small Island
States), financing constraints have become severe with neither the private nor
the public sector being in a position to act alone. In these instances, regional
infrastructures can also help serve national infrastructure in less developed
regions, rural and under-served areas, and leverage resources cost effectively.
In some cases, additional partners can be brought into the process as well.
Regional organizations and institutions can help facilitate cooperation and
coordination and international financial institutions and donors can then play a
vital role in seeding and facilitating the financing for such regional
infrastructure projects. There is likely then to be increased market interest
once the coordinated policy framework is in place.
Conclusions |
 |
|
On “fully exploiting” existing mechanisms
In the context of infrastructure development and enhanced access to ICT,
national governments and other stakeholders have many tools and opportunities
available to them to enhance the attractiveness of their ICT markets for
investors and financiers. These include:
- Continued promotion of a
level-playing field for ICT investments and regulatory policies that entice open
access and fair competition for enhanced service provision, and new
entrepreneurial investment in under-served areas.
- Refinement and efficient
implementation of targeted public finance mechanisms such as loan guarantees,
universal access funds and partnership investments.
- Continued support and
promotion of domestic, regional and South-South investment and increased
sub-regional and regional cooperation to address current infrastructure and last
mile gaps.
- Enabling tax, tariff, import and business regulation policies
designed to reduce risks and financial burdens for, and provide incentives to, ICT investors and financiers.
On the “adequacy” of existing mechanisms
As the Task Force findings indicate, there are a number of areas in which
current approaches to ICTD financing, by both the public and private sectors,
have not devoted sufficient attention to date, and which represent fundamental
challenges to the financial and development communities. These include:
- ICT
capacity-building programmes, materials, tools, educational funding and
specialized training initiatives, especially for regulators and other public
sector employees and organizations.
- Communications access and connectivity for
voice, mobile, and data services in remote rural areas, isolated islands and
other locations presenting unique technological and market challenges.
- Regional backbone infrastructure to link networks across borders in economically
disadvantaged regions requiring coordinated legal, regulatory and financial
frameworks and seed financing.
- Broadband capacity to facilitate the delivery
of services, catalyze investment and provide Internet access at affordable
prices to both existing and new users.
- ICT applications and content aimed at
facilitating the integration of ICT into the implementation of development
programmes particularly in health, education and poverty reduction. There is
also a need to focus on applications and processes that can ensure development
of content relevant to the needs of the developing world, including material in
indigenous languages, information accessible to non-literate audiences,
user-friendly and affordable software platforms and interactive applications,
and diverse, locally produced multimedia content.
The reasons that existing
mechanisms and traditional approaches may not be adequately oriented to address
these emerging needs are several:
- Private sector investors and businesses are
often reluctant to commit capital to projects with high risk/low return
profiles.
- Donors have taken initiatives in many of these areas, but do not
have sufficient resources to cover the broad scope of needs across the
developing world.
- Governments have very limited resources and multiple
commitments, as well as inexperience with many of the key areas of need.
On “improvements and innovations” to existing financing mechanisms
As documented in the Task Force report, nearly every major financial
institution, organization, company and government agency that deals with the
ICT development sector is almost constantly in some stage of self-evaluation,
reorientation and exploration of new and improved modes of operation. It is
difficult to pinpoint specific changes that should be made to a single mechanism
or group of mechanisms urgently, which those institutions themselves are not
already considering to one degree or another.
One thing is clear. The Task Force
discussions have provided a unique forum for many of these stakeholders to
exchange and propose ideas, both individually and collectively, for new
initiatives and approaches that might be worthy of further consideration by the
larger body of international ICTD players. While none of these options should be
taken as officially evaluated or “endorsed” by the full Task Force, there has
been at least significant discussion and open-minded consideration of a healthy
range of prospects for enhancing the global ICTD financing dynamic. Some of
these prospects are discussed on the next page.
Coordination
Greater cross-sectoral and cross-institutional coordination of financing
programmes and ICT development initiatives would improve effectiveness and make
better use of resources. It was generally agreed that the onus for coordinating
inputs rests primarily with national governments (coordinating at the national,
regional, and international levels). And so governments should identify
priorities and ensure multi-sectoral participation in ICT programmes through
strategic planning. Donors and other financial institutions should, for their
part, be prepared to work within these national frameworks on a complementary
basis, while making renewed efforts to coordinate planning, implementation and
evaluation on an international and regional basis as well.
Multi-stakeholder partnerships
The emerging trend of multi-stakeholder initiatives to support ICT
development and financing needs should continue and expand, to enhance overall
programme coordination and ensure that diverse views and experiences are brought
together to address sector challenges. Some specific options for new
multi-stakeholder approaches on an international or regional level could
include:
- Establishment of a “virtual” financing facility to leverage multiple
sources in support of identified investment objectives in key locations (notably
broadband, rural and regional projects and capacity building).
- Creation of a
mechanism for coordinating research and analysis into enabling policy
environments, to identify best practices and priority needs for shared action by
financial actors.
- Development of a “rapid response” policy and regulatory
support mechanism to intervene in support of short-term ICT sector policy
initiatives.
- Coordinated programmes by governments and major financial players
to mitigate investment risks and transaction costs for operators entering less
attractive rural and low-income market segments. Also to be considered are new
paradigms for network and service development involving a separation of an
“open-access” backbone and diverse service provision.
- Collective initiatives
to engage regional, inter-governmental organizations together with diverse
financial institutions and investors to create incentives for building regional
infrastructure capacity.
- Creation of jointly financed international and
regional programmes for public sector capacity building and e-government
applications development, offering low-cost tools and training options to
government ICT policy and implementation officials.
- Public-public and
public-private approaches to support the upfront investment, capacity
development and mainstreaming costs to facilitate the effective integration of ICT in health, education and other development sectors to permit the more
cost-effective and broader delivery of public services.
- Continued exploration
by donors and multilateral development banks of new modalities — including the
consideration of re-engaging in infrastructure investments — through which they
can provide financial support to well-designed public sector ICT projects and
programmes, particularly when they have the potential to leverage additional
private resources.
New emphasis on domestic finance
Governments, bilateral donors, multilateral banks, as well as private sector
contributors, can all help accelerate the growth of domestic financial
mechanisms by providing more direct and creative support to local microfinance
instruments, ICT small business incubators, public credit instruments,
franchises, reverse auction mechanisms, community networking initiatives, and
other innovations. Such approaches require a combination of outside seed funding
assistance, technical expertise and best practice advice, risk mitigation, and
commitments to support local entrepreneurs and investors, particularly in the
start-up stages of new projects. The finance and development communities must
recognize that failures are inevitable in these newly emerging markets, but that
the lessons of these experiments, together with selected, well-documented
successes, can yield long-term benefits and self-reinforcing growth throughout
the developing world.
Encouragement of increased voluntary, consumer-based contributions
Many consumers in the wealthy countries of the world (including immigrant
expatriates) would be receptive to the introduction of new voluntary mechanisms
for donating small contributions towards ICT-based development. New vehicles
should be explored to facilitate such contributions on a simple,
technology-driven basis, while ensuring that any funds collected are devoted
directly to pertinent development needs, including support for creative
applications and low-price access to services for the poor and access/service
cooperatives owned by communities themselves.
* Extracts from the Report of the Task Force on Financial Mechanisms for ICT
for Development (see http://www.itu.int/wsis/tffm/final-report.pdf). The World Summit
on Information Society (WSIS), the first phase of which was concluded in Geneva
in 2003, recommended that “while all existing financial mechanisms should be
fully exploited to make available the benefits of information and communication
technologies (ICT), a thorough review of their adequacy in meeting the
challenges of ICT for development should be completed by the end of December
2004. This review was to be conducted by a Task Force under the auspices of the
United Nations Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, and its findings were to be
submitted for consideration to the second phase of the Summit in Tunis in
November 2005.
Responding to this request, the UN Secretary-General asked the United Nations
Development Programme (UNDP) to lead the Task Force on Financial Mechanisms for
ICT for Development, in collaboration with the World Bank, the United Nations
Department of Economic and Social Affairs and other key partners, including ITU.
The report of the Task Force entitled: A review of trends and an analysis of
gaps and promising practices was presented to the second meeting of the
Summit Preparatory Committee (PrepCom-2) that took place in Geneva from 17 to 25
February 2005. |
|