Diverse region, diverse needs
The Asia-Pacific Regional Preparatory
Meeting was held in Bali at the end of April 2001. Hosted at the invitation of
the Government of Indonesia, the meeting provided a forum for ITU Member States
and Sector Members in the region to establish their telecommunication
development goals for the next four years and to highlight issues that need to
be addressed to achieve those goals. This article looks at the key points of
discussion at the Bali meeting: policy and regulation; infrastructure and new
technologies; universal access and information and communication technologies
(ICT); finance and investment; and human resources development.
Policy and regulatory issues
In the area of policy and regulation,
the Asia-Pacific region places emphasis on receiving advice on ways of creating
and strengthening regulatory bodies. Statistics from the ITU World
Telecommunication Regulatory Database 2001 show that only 34 per cent of
Asia-Pacific regulators are considered separate bodies, the lowest percentage of
all regions. Countries in the region express the need to improve and update
regulatory frameworks in the areas of interconnection, licensing, tariffs and
dispute settlement. Those in the throes of transition seek timely advice in
developing a roadmap to navigate their way from sector-specific to convergent
ICT legislation. In particular, the region wishes to develop model laws or
guidelines that take into account socio-economic concerns such as cybercrime,
security, privacy, harmful content and taxation.
Infrastructure and new technologies
Like other regions, the general thrust
in Asia and the Pacific is on establishing the necessary information
infrastructure and improving interconnectivity within and between countries to
bridge the digital divide. In particular, the region underscores the need to:
-
Assist small countries in their commercial negotiations
with carriers for interconnection to the backbone or global networks. A
better focus needs to be put on interconnectivity and quality of service
(QoS) to cope with the increase of Internet traffic.
-
Include in ITU statistics data of markets not yet served,
in particular, data of small markets in developing countries.
-
Promote industry cooperation so that new technologies and
their standards can be applied harmoniously to enhance access to affordable
services.
-
Extend the Internet to rural and remote areas in a
cost-effective manner by promoting national and regional initiatives.
-
Provide assistance in digital broadcasting and in
applying digital delivery systems to rural areas to meet the needs of
converging networks.
-
Encourage countries to submit proposals to the ITU
Telecommunication Development Bureau (BDT) within the scope of the wireless
IP rural telecommunication project.
Universal access and ICT
The general concept of universal access
pervades the specific needs of each region. However, similar priorities tend
to come into play when establishing general guidelines and frameworks within
which the development of each region and use of ICTs can take place. In view of
the broad framework, it would be helpful for all regions to revisit the
definition of universal access with a view to refining its measurement.
In the case of the Asia-Pacific region, some countries need
assistance in QoS and advice on mechanisms or solutions for affordable access to
basic communication and information services, especially in rural and remote
areas. Other priorities include the need to:
-
Spread the message that ICT is as important as basic
infrastructure.
-
Request ITU to provide a clear definition of universal
access and ICTs, which could be incorporated into national plans and
policies.
-
Develop digital laws and identify model legislation in
areas such as e-commerce, privacy and cybercrime.
-
Promote investment and tariff policies on the provision
of infrastructure and Internet access, especially in remote and rural areas.
-
Bring the issue of Internet charging to the attention of
WTDC–02.
-
Develop skills to effectively use ICTs.
-
Bring to the attention of WTDC–02 the use of community
teleservice centres as a way of providing access to rural areas.
-
Promote the development of relevant content as well as
use of local languages.
Finance and investment
One very common priority in all
five regions is the need to establish a framework that is conducive to
investment. The Asia-Pacific region needs direct assistance to service providers
and regulators in the areas of costing and pricing, interconnection charges and
computation of universal service funds. Advice is also sought on techniques and
models, for example, a licensing-fee structure to attract investment in wired
and wireless technologies as well as in broadcasting services. ITU is requested
to endorse country-specific telecommunication projects to international
development agencies with a view to implementing them jointly.
Human resources development
There appears to be an overall
consensus not just on building a truly integrated human resources system that is
able to identify the changing needs of the telecommunication sector, but
also on offering the necessary training programmes and expertise to respond to
those needs. All regions consider ITU Centres of Excellence, and training
centres in general, as focal points. These centres allow strategic alliances to
be fostered among industry, educational institutions and the community. Besides,
they promote regional cooperation. All regions tend to acknowledge the
importance of supporting entrepreneurial spirit and customer/market-driven
culture in capacity-building.
The Asia-Pacific region highlights the fast rate of
technological change and sector expansion, which puts tremendous pressure on the
upgrading of skills. There is recognition in the region for those strategic
alliances to be encouraged in order to mainstream skills into vocational
training schemes. The region has a shortage of ICT specialists, and places
emphasis on assisting institutions to use more ICT-based tools such as distance
learning. The Pacific island subregion has unique needs and characteristics that
can be only met with the use of ICT. Proper indicators for ICT-literacy should
be identified and quantified.
|