INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
RADIOCOMMUNICATION ADVISORY GROUP

GENEVA, 23-25 JANUARY 1995 Document RAG95/4-E
9 December 1994
Original: English                                 
                                 
                                 
                             Australia
                                 
                                 
                   COUNTRY NAMES IN RR FOOTNOTES
                                                 

1    Introduction

     WARC-92 experienced a flood of additions of country names to
existing footnotes without the application of a review procedure to
ensure that the additions were fully understood and accepted by
other countries.

     Many new footnotes were generated without any real attempt to
standardize texts and ensure clarity.

     The VGE Report and recommendations relating to footnotes
contain positive proposals that would help to reduce the
proliferation of footnotes, encourage standardization of texts and
the removal of country names where these are no longer needed.

     A rather different problem concerns the emergence of new
countries with different boundaries from those applying to the
country of which they were previously part. This clearly requires
some revision of country names in footnotes.


2    Proposals

2.1  In order to facilitate WRC-95 handling of footnotes, the
Radiocommunication Bureau should now invite all administrations to
review country footnotes in which they are named with a view to
deletion at WRC-95 of their names as far as practicable.

     The invitation should refer specifically to the VGE Report and
recommendations and to the results of the related surveys on
footnotes containing country names carried out by the Radio
Regulations Board.

     Administrations should be requested to make formal proposals
to WRC-95 for removal of their country names from footnotes.

2.2  New ITU Members who were part of a country named in a footnote
should be invited to review the need to be named in that footnote.

2.3  The RAG should recommend a procedure for application at WRC-95
and subsequent WRCs requiring formal submission and consideration
of documents for all cases where a country wishes to add its name
to an existing footnote.

                               ******