1 Scope
2 References
2.1 Normative references
2.2 Informative references
3 Terms, definitions and acronyms
4 User requirements
5 Description of the full reference measurement method
6 Findings of the Video Quality Experts Group (VQEG)
7 Conclusions
Appendix I - Full
reference perceptual video quality measurement models
I.1 Model descriptions
I.1.1 PSNR
I.1.2 CPqD
I.1.3 Tektronix/Sarnoff
I.1.4 NHK/Mitsubishi Electric Corp.
I.1.5 KDD
I.1.6 EPFL
I.1.7 NASA
I.1.8 KPN/Swisscom CT
I.1.9 NTIA
I.2 References
Appendix II - CPqD
Video quality assessment using objective parameters based on image segmentation
II.1 Introduction
II.2 Subjective assessment tests
II.2.1 Sessions of subjective evaluation
II.2.2 Natural scenes
II.2.3 Systems under test
II.3 Objective measurements based on context
II.3.1 Video material used for objective evaluation
II.3.2 Spatial segmentation
II.3.3 Objective parameters
II.4 Subjective quality estimation
II.4.1 Subjective quality estimation based on a single parameter: Logistic
approximation
II.4.2 Subjective quality estimation: Linear prediction in three steps
II.4.3 Subjective quality estimation: Presentation and discussion of results
II.5 Conclusions
II.6 References
Appendix III -
Tektronix/Sarnoff
III.1 PQR objective picture quality rating in operational environments
III.2 Pre-processing of video – Normalization
III.3 System overview
III.4 Algorithm overview
III.4.1 Front end processing
III.4.2 Luma
processing
III.4.3 Chroma processing
III.4.4 Output summaries
III.5 Correlation with subjective results
III.5.1 Overview
III.5.2 Video test set and processing
III.5.3 Subjective evaluation
III.5.4 Objective picture quality assessment
III.5.5 Comparison of subjective and objective assessments
III.6 References
Appendix IV - NHK/Mitsubishi
Electric Corp.
IV.1 Method of evaluating quality deterioration objectively
IV.2 Human visual characteristics
IV.2.1 Spatial frequency response of visibility
IV.2.2 Frequency response of visibility depending on picture brightness
IV.2.3 Visual sensitivity depending on brightness
IV.3 Realization of visual functions by digital filter
IV.3.1 Structure of the assessment system
IV.3.2 Brightness-adaptive 3D digital filter
IV.3.3 Adaptive spatial filter depending on picture brightness
IV.3.4 Volcano-shaped spatial frequency response
IV.4 Example of assessment by the picture quality assessment system
IV.5 Real-time picture quality assessment system
IV.6 References
Appendix V - KDD
Objective video quality assessment scheme and performance evaluation
V.1 Scope
V.2 Objective video quality assessment scheme
V.3 Implementation
V.3.1 Synchronization module
V.3.2 Calculation module
V.4 Verification results
V.5 References
Appendix VI - EPFL
Appendix VII - NASA
VII.1 Introduction
VII.2 The DVQ metric
VII.2.1 Input
VII.2.2 Colour transformations
VII.2.3 Blocked DCT
VII.2.4 Local contrast
VII.2.5 Temporal filtering
VII.2.6 JND conversion
VII.2.7 Contrast masking
VII.2.8 Minkowski pooling
VII.3 Evaluation
VII.4 References
Appendix VIII -
KPN/Swisscom CT
VIII.1 Introduction
VIII.2 References
Appendix IX - NTIA
IX.1 Description of VQM algorithm
IX.2 Spatial gradient parameters
IX.3 Edge enhancement filters
IX.4 S-T region size
IX.5 Description of features
IX.6 Impairment masking functions
IX.7 Spatial collapsing function
IX.8 Temporal collapsing functions
IX.9 Three spatial gradient parameters
IX.10 Chrominance parameter
IX.11 VQM computation
IX.12 Description of subjective data sets
IX.13 Results
IX.14 References