• Report on Resolution 9 (Rev. Istanbul, 2002) and Question 21/2
    • TABLE OF CONTENTS
    • ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
    • PREFACE
    • REPORT ON RESOLUTION 9 (REV. ISTANBUL, 2002) AND QUESTION 21/2
      • 1 Introduction
        • 1.1 ITU-D and ITU-R Joint Group for Resolution 9 (2002-2003)
        • 1.2 Work Programme
        • 1.3 Structure of the Report
          • 1.3.1 Part I: National use of spectrum 960-3 000 MHz
          • 1.3.2 Part II: National spectrum management practices
          • 1.3.3 Part III: Calculation of frequency fees
        • 1.4 Proposals for future work
      • PART I
        • 2 Analysis of the Submissions to Part I of the Questionnaires
          • 2.1 Overview
          • 2.2 Some examples of national allocation tables
          • 2.3 Further sources of information on national strategies for spectrum management
      • PART II
        • 3 Analysis of the submissions to Part II of the questionnaire
          • 3.1 General structure of Part II of the questionnaire
          • 3.2 Legal and regulatory aspects: questions 1, 2, 4 and 5
            • 3.2.1 Question 1: Legal and regulatory texts
            • 3.2.2 Question 2: Regulations and procedures
            • 3.2.3 Question 4: Equipment - technical requirements and standards
            • 3.2.4 Question 5: Spectrum Redeployment
          • 3.3 Updating the database: Questions 3 and 10
            • 3.3.1 Question 3: National Frequency Allocation Table
            • 3.3.2 Question 10: Policy and planning functions
          • 3.4 Assignments (generic): Questions 7, 8, 9 and 11
          • 3.5 Spectrum management: Questions 6, 15 and 16
          • 3.6 Spectrum monitoring: Questions 12, 13 and 14
            • 3.6.1 Fixed monitoring stations
            • 3.6.2 Mobile monitoring stations
            • 3.6.3 Transportable monitoring stations
            • 3.6.4 Space monitoring stations
          • 3.7 Handbooks and reports
          • 3.8 Problems
      • ANNEX 1-A – Index of submitters and designated focal points
      • ANNEX 1-B – Table 1 – Extract from the submission of Albania
      • ANNEX 1-C – Table 2 – Extract from the submission of United Kingdom
      • ANNEX 1-D – Extract from the submission of the US Federal Government
      • ANNEX 1-E – Table 4 – Extract from the submission of the Czech Republic
      • ANNEX 2-A – Question 1: Regulatory texts
      • ANNEX 2-B – Question 2: Are regulations and procedures publicly available?
      • ANNEX 2-C – Question 4: Compliance Procedures
      • ANNEX 2-D – Question 5: Spectrum redeployment
      • ANNEX 2-E – Responses concerning Questions 3 et 10
      • ANNEX 2-F – Responses concerning Question 6
      • ANNEX 2-G – SECTION 1 – Use of computers for national spectrum management
      • ANNEX 2-G – SECTION 2 – Administrative Management
      • ANNEX 2-H – Responses concerning responsibilities of spectrum management (Question 16 b) and c))
      • ANNEX 2-I – Responses concerning human resources (Question 16 e) and f))
      • ANNEX 2-J – List of fixed, mobile and transportable radio monitoring stations by Member State
      • ANNEX 2-K – Radio monitoring stations
      • ANNEX 2-L – Responses concerning cooperation between spectrum management and monitoring (Question 12 r), s), t) and...
      • ANNEX 2-M – Responses concerning inspection of radio stations (Question 13)
      • ANNEX 2-N – Responses concerning handbooks and reports (Question 17) – SECTION 1 – Response by country
      • ANNEX 2-N – SECTION 2 – Breakdown of answers
      • ANNEX 2-O – Responses concerning the identification of problems experienced in national spectrum management (Questi...
      • PART III
        • 1 Introduction
        • 2 Questionnaire responses
        • 3 Analysis of responses
          • 3.1 General questions (Q1 to Q5)
            • 3.1.1 Question Q.1: Are there any legal texts on the establishment of frequency fees?
            • 3.1.2 Question Q.2: What procedure (regulatory, legislative, etc.) is used to review and update your system for setting frequency fees? Are reviews conducted at pre-established regular intervals? Does recourse to market mechanisms (auctions, calls for te
            • 3.1.3 Question Q.3: Are the same approaches and principles used to set frequency fees for all users?
            • 3.1.4 Question Q.4: In addition to direct frequency fees, certain administrations require the payment of additional spectrum-related charges (for example, for spectrum access, spectrum replanning, management of equipment using the frequencies, etc.). Doe
            • 3.1.5 Question Q.5: To which institution(s) are the frequency fees and any additional charges collected paid?
          • 3.2 Exemption from payment of frequency fees
          • 3.3 The application of frequency fees
            • 3.3.1 Methods used by administrations
            • 3.3.2 Explanations, grounds and objectives
            • 3.3.3 Recourse to market mechanisms
        • 4 Updating the report and database
          • 4.1 Updating the report
          • 4.2 Updating the database
        • 5 Analysis of results
          • 5.1 Variables used to determine fees
            • 5.1.1 Variables and applications identified in questionnaire
            • 5.1.2 Processing of responses from administrations
            • 5.1.3 Analysis of variables used
          • 5.2 Fee size
          • 5.3 Recourse to market mechanisms
          • 5.4 Advantages and disadvantages of each approach
        • 6 Database
        • 7 Using the database
      • ANNEX 1 – Definition of Question 21/2
        • 1 Statement of the situation or problem
        • 2 Question or issue proposed for study
        • 3 Expected outputs
        • 4 Required timing of the expected output
        • 5 Proposers/sponsors
        • 6 Source of required inputs
        • 7 Target audience for the output
        • 8 Proposed method of handling this Question
        • 9 Coordination requirements for the study
      • ANNEX 2 – Spectrum Fees Database statistics for all countries