| 
| 
	
		| 
  
    | OECD Conference on ICTs, the Environment and Climate Change |  
    | Helsingør, Denmark | 27 - 28 May 2009 |  |  
		| 
  
    | Distinguished guests, Ladies and Gentlemen, 
 I would like to start by thanking OECD for inviting ITU to participate in 
	this event. I would also like to thanks our hosts the Ministry for Science 
	Technology and Innovation for their kind hospitality.
 
 Many organization are involved in the fight against climate change, and it 
	is events like this thank that bring us together so we all know what we are 
	contributing, and help us avoid duplication of effort.
 
 ITU has had a longstanding concern about the impact of ICTs on the 
	environment but it was only in the last two years that ITU became really 
	active in this area following a visit by UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon 
	when he recognized ITU as “one of the most important stakeholders in terms 
	of climate change".
 
 In fact ITU was the first ICT global standards body – 144 years ago 
	established to agree international standards to ensure the international 
	interoperability of the innovative telex service. It remains the unique: a 
	truly global partnership of 191 governments and over 700 private sector 
	entities developing international standards and treaties on the use of ICTs.
 
 When we initiated our activity on climate change I was often asked “What has 
	ITU got to do with climate change”. I am pleased to say we do not often get 
	asked that question now. I believe the relevance of ICTs to climate change 
	is now well accepted.
 
 Our activity on climate change was initiated by a Technology Watch Report on 
	ICTs and Climate Change which we published at the end of 2007. This was 
	enthusiastically received by our membership and we followed it with two very 
	successful symposia in Kyoto and London last year.
 
 One thing that these symposia highlighted was the variation in the estimates 
	of the impact of ICTs on GHG emissions. The estimates of the contribution of 
	ICTs to total GHG emissions varied from 2% to 3.5% including 
	radiocommunications. Most significant was the estimates of how much the 
	application of ICTs could reduce total GHG. These estimates ranged from 15% 
	to over 40%.
 
 The reason for this variation was that different methodologies were being 
	used. Clearly such a wide variation of estimates led to some skepticism as 
	to the impact of ICTs. ITU has consequently put a lot of effort into 
	developing an internationally agreed common methodology and a Focus Group 
	open to all interested parties was established last July to come up with a 
	common methodology. I am pleased to say that this was successful and the 
	Focus Group presented its final report a couple of weeks ago.
 
 A new Environment and Climate Change Study Group will now take this work 
	forward starting this week and convert it into formal ITU standards. This 
	should not take long since the hard work has been done and our approval 
	process in ITU is one of the fastest of any standards body.
 
 The group will consider a range of issues including recycling, renewal of 
	use, harmful effect and application of ICTs in buildings, transportation 
	etc. We very much welcome contributions to this work in particular those 
	entities that participated in our Focus Group. We are also keen to involve 
	academia and research establishments in our work.
 
 ITU also regulates the use of the radio spectrum and provides the 
	frequencies for remote sensing (active and passive) for environmental 
	observation, which can be used to forecast weather and warn the public in 
	the case of natural disasters and to gather information on dynamic 
	environmental processes and systems, working closely with the World 
	Metrological Organisation.
 
 In order to achieve our own commitment to climate neutrality, ITU has 
	introduced a number of initiatives:
 
 
	ITU also helps countries to adapt to the effects of climate change. 
	Fostering use of emergency telecommunications for countries struck by 
	extreme weather events. We also need to sensitise the consumer to the need 
	to change their behavior.Many of our meetings are now totally paperless and we make extensive use 
	of remote working toolsFor example our Focus Group on Climate Change had 28 conference calls and 
	only three physical meetingsOur Recommendations are now freely available on-lineWe have conducted an energy audit and are actively seeking to reduce our 
	carbon footprintWe webcast most of our workshops and seminarsAnd we are organizing the first virtual Symposium on Climate Change next 
	September with the Korean government 
 And our Telecommunication Standardisation Sector is developing more energy 
	efficiency standards. Next Generation Networks for example will provide an 
	estimated 40% power saving over the current PSTN.
 ITU is also leading the Dynamic Coalition on Internet and Climate Change (DCICC) 
	as part of Internet Governance Forum and will convene its second meeting and 
	host a workshop at the IGF in Egypt in November. DCICC now has 22 members 
	including OECD.
 And of course, ITU being a UN agency is a key part of the overall UN effort 
	on tackling climate change. We are making every effort therefore to convey 
	the message to global leaders of the importance of recognizing the role of 
	ICTs in any future agreements, such as the one expected to be agreed here in 
	December in Copenhagen.
 Meeting these commitments includes the need for common reporting formats and 
	methodologies to calculate national GHG emissions. In turn, agreed 
	methodologies for calculations in the ICT sector can be based on our global 
	standard.
 While it was not formally part of the Kyoto process, now we have a common 
	approach to calculating the impact of ICTs on climate change, it could be 
	taken into account in future agreements.
 
 Even if one takes the most conservative estimate of the reduction in total 
	GHG emissions that can be achieved through the application of ICTs over the 
	next 10 years, it equates to something like the current level of emissions 
	of the United States or China.
 
 Clearly then this is a significant contribution to the global effort to 
	combat climate change.
 |  |  |  |  |