Is the industry banking on broadband?
The world has around 63 million “broadband” subscribers today, according
to Birth of Broadband, a new a report issued on 16 September 2003 by the
International Telecommunication Union. Leading the way in broadband penetration
is the Republic of Korea, with approximately 21 broadband subscribers for every
100 inhabitants. Hong Kong, China ranks second in the world with nearly 15
broadband subscribers per 100 inhabitants and Canada ranks third with just over
11 broadband subscribers per 100 inhabitants.
Broadband services provide Internet connections that are at least five times
faster than earlier dial-up technologies, enabling users to access information
much faster and more efficiently than before
ITU 020047/PhotoDisc |
One reason for the sharp increase in broadband subscribers is the growing
demand for faster Internet speeds. Broadband services provide Internet
connections that are at least five times faster than earlier dial-up
technologies, enabling users to play online games and download music and videos,
as well as share files and access information much faster and more efficiently
than before.
Following the introduction of commercial broadband services, many economies
have enjoyed a continued period of growth in broadband subscriber numbers, with
these numbers rising impressively since 1999 (see Figure 1, top chart). In
certain markets, broadband is predicted to be one of the fastest-growing
communications-based consumer services. For example, in the United States,
broadband is likely to reach the 25 per cent penetration mark more quickly than
either personal computers or mobile telephones did (see Figure
1, bottom chart).
Broadband is increasingly regarded as a catalyst for economic success in the
information economy. And more and more economies are focused on ensuring that
access to broadband is both available and affordable to their population. In
most economies, the availability of affordable broadband access has been driven
largely by the private sector — particularly where effective competition is
present in the market — and supported by government intervention.
Figure 1 —
Growth in
broadband penetration worldwide
Worldwide broadband penetration growth has increased at compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of 155 per cent since 1999 (top chart). Broadband growth in
the United States has far outstripped mobile growth for the four years after
reaching 2.5 million subscribers (bottom chart).
|
|
The title of the new ITU Report “Birth of Broadband” reflects the view
that broadband is still just at the start of its growth cycle, with the
main phase of market expansion still to come
Broadband is one of the “hot
topics” of the telecommunication industry this year. It is also expected to be
one of the highlights of the ITU TELECOM
WORLD 2003 Event. ITU in its commitment to play a positive
role in the development of the information society specially prepared a report
entitled Birth of Broadband to mark this all-important global show.
Birth of Broadband is the fifth in the series of “ITU Internet Reports”,
originally launched in 1997. This new edition examines the emergence of
high-speed, dedicated Internet connections that will greatly expand the world’s
access to information, and looks at how broadband will also facilitate the
long-expected convergence of three previously distinct technologies: computing,
communications and broadcasting. The report covers broadband technologies,
supply trends and models, applications and content, regulatory and competition
issues, successful broadband promotion and broadband in the information society.
It draws entirely on country case studies carried out on sample economies around
the globe. Finally, the report contains a statistical annex providing the latest
data on 206 economies.
Birth of Broadband was written by a team from the ITU Strategy and
Policy Unit (SPU). This special issue of ITU News highlights a number of
extracts adapted from the new report.
For more information or to order the report, visit the website at: http://www.itu.int/birthofbroadband. |
|
|
Broadband availability
Despite the overall growth in broadband penetration, certain economies have
enjoyed more success in advancing its adoption than others. By year-end 2002,
broadband services had been made commercially available in 82 out of over 200
economies worldwide. Most economies are still struggling to realize nationwide
broadband access. This is principally because broadband network deployment comes
with high fixed costs.
In the broadband era, personal computers and personal digital assistants are
not the only types of terminal for accessing the Internet. Since the advent of
higher-speed networks, manufacturers have been developing other broadband
terminals, such as video game consoles, Internet television appliances, set-top
boxes and home servers
ITU 992408/A. de Ferron |
The vast majority of broadband users today are in the developed world.
However, as the cost of the service becomes cheaper, some developing countries
may be able to use wireless broadband technology to leapfrog ahead of the
traditional wireline infrastructure. Instead of waiting for wireline services,
which can be costly to deploy, they can potentially use broadband to develop an
integrated voice, data and video network. For example, in Bhutan, wireless
broadband technologies are currently used to provide basic voice telephone
access. Broadband technologies have connected villages that previously were out
of range of traditional telephone service.
With satellite and wireless broadband solutions still in their relative
infancy, most broadband users rely on fixed-line connections to access the
Internet, mainly through digital subscriber line (DSL) — using traditional
fixed telephone lines — or cable modems (using cable television networks). DSL
services were first launched commercially in 1996, and have since become a
popular form of broadband access, with nearly 32 million subscribers worldwide
at year-end 2002. Taken by region, DSL is more common in Asia and Europe, and
cable is particularly popular in the Americas.
In general, countries with high levels of gross national income (GNI) per
capita can be expected to have high broadband penetration levels. Likewise,
there is a strong correlation between urbanization and population density and
the supply of broadband services. Given the lower cost of connecting users who
live within a short distance of each other, broadband providers have found it
easier to achieve a higher return on investment in urban areas, especially where
a high percentage of potential users live in apartment blocks.
For businesses, the new generation of broadband services competes very
effectively with leased lines, which have traditionally served the corporate
sector. In fact, in some markets, broadband can be up to 111 times cheaper, per
megabyte per second, than today’s private network options. The cost savings
alone suggest a major incentive for business and government users to shift to
broadband. With its increased speed and efficiency, broadband also offers an
excellent infrastructure for e-government and e-education services, such as
online driver’s licence renewals, electronic tax filing, and online library
and learning resources (see our story: Using broadband)
Broadband over unlicensed spectrum
Wi-Fi, or the 802.11 family of standards, have emerged as the most popular
standard for wireless LAN solutions using the 2.4 GHz unlicensed portion of the
radio spectrum (see our story: Wi-Fi takes the sector by storm). In general, the commercial deployment of Wi-Fi
services is subject to different considerations than commercial broadband
services using licensed radio spectrum, such as fixed-wireless. Constrained by
its limited range on the one hand but benefiting from greater affordability and
scalability on the other, providers have come up with a variety of business
models exploiting unlicensed portions of radio spectrum.
Hotspots at public locations, such as airports and train stations, enable
users to gain Internet access without having to plug in their laptops or
personal digital assistants
ITU 030119/Corbis |
Currently, there are two popular ways of distributing Wi-Fi access. The first
of these is the “top-down model”, which has been adopted by large network
providers who charge a fee for broadband access at public locations, called “hotspots”,
in such places as airports and train stations. These hotspots enable users to
gain Internet access without having to plug in their laptops or personal digital
assistants (PDA). The second is the “bottom-up” model, where wireless access
is provided free of cost by enthusiasts. Both of these models have
disadvantages. The former suffers from market fragmentation, with different
hotspots served by different providers, meaning that the user has to open
multiple accounts to gain Internet access each time they use a different
location. The latter suffers from a lack of economic sustainability (no profit
is made) and the risk of customer abuse.
Recently however, hybrid business models combining the two models have
emerged, giving users the advantage of a single wireless access account, coupled
with a financial incentive for providers to join such a scheme. An example of
this is the approach taken by a United States-based Wi-Fi start-up, Boingo
Wireless, that acts as an aggregator, allowing users to access Wi-Fi hotspots
deployed by all existing providers with a single account.
Broadband over existing infrastructures
In a number of economies, companies supplying public utilities, in particular
power companies, have started to make use of their existing infrastructure to
transport broadband traffic to businesses and residences. They typically have
good customer penetration, a robust communication infrastructure and an
incentive to respond to current customer needs. As an example, electricity
utilities have internal needs for data communications within their power
networks. These companies often have extensive networks of fibre-optic cables
within the power grid to enable communications between electrical sub-stations.
Once fibre is installed in the power grid, the excess capacity can be used to
accommodate other rural users in the service area. Most of the cost of laying
the fibre can be justified through savings achieved from more efficient
electricity distribution. As a result, the incremental cost of opening up the
network for broadband communications can be minimized.
Using a range of transmission mediums such as fibre, fixed wireless access
and new technologies, such as power line communication and others, power
companies have entered the broadband access market in a number of countries such
as Iceland and Japan by leveraging the existing telecommunication infrastructure
between their installations. For example, the Reykjavik Power Company has
established a data transmission network over its power grid that connects its
power transformer stations around the capital. Supplemented by fibre and
fixed-wireless access, the company currently offers broadband solutions to
corporate customers.
The power network, however, is not the only public infrastructure network to
be leveraged on to expand broadband access. In developing economies in
particular, alternative networks to power or telephone lines can be a bonus for
long-haul broadband supply. India provides an example of the ingenious use of
its vast railway network to extend broadband access to its rural areas (see
box). These examples illustrate the vast range of possible approaches to
supplying broadband, particularly when fixed and wireless technologies can be
combined to resolve long- and short-distance, rural and urban broadband
infrastructure problems.
Table 1 — Broadband costs may be equal, but incomes are not
Lowest broadband price offering as a percentage of monthly income in fifty
cheapest economies (2003)
Economy |
Subscription per month (USD) |
Price per 100 kbit/s
(USD) |
Subscription as %
of
monthly income |
100 kbit/s as %
of
monthly income |
Japan |
24.19 |
0.09 |
1.11 |
<0.01 |
Korea (Rep. of) |
49.23 |
0.25 |
3.58 |
0.02 |
Belgium |
34.41 |
1.15 |
1.51 |
0.05 |
Hong Kong, China |
38.21 |
1.27 |
1.71 |
0.06 |
Singapore |
33.18 |
2.21 |
1.69 |
0.11 |
United States |
52.99 |
3.53 |
1.81 |
0.12 |
Canada |
32.48 |
3.25 |
1.39 |
0.14 |
Netherlands |
51.55 |
3.36 |
2.25 |
0.15 |
Macao, China |
38.34 |
2.56 |
2.43 |
0.16 |
New Zealand |
40.61 |
2.71 |
2.43 |
0.16 |
Germany |
33.93 |
4.42 |
1.55 |
0.20 |
Norway |
46.16 |
6.56 |
1.55 |
0.22 |
Israel |
20.40 |
3.98 |
1.27 |
0.25 |
Austria |
45.20 |
5.89 |
1.92 |
0.25 |
Slovenia |
79.54 |
3.88 |
5.40 |
0.26 |
Italy |
73.59 |
6.13 |
3.49 |
0.29 |
United Kingdom |
32.59 |
6.37 |
1.51 |
0.30 |
Luxembourg |
91.77 |
17.92 |
2.16 |
0.42 |
Sweden |
44.56 |
8.91 |
2.13 |
0.43 |
Switzerland |
57.84 |
11.30 |
2.22 |
0.43 |
Australia |
50.56 |
9.87 |
2.25 |
0.44 |
France |
51.46 |
10.05 |
2.36 |
0.46 |
Ireland |
61.69 |
12.05 |
2.64 |
0.52 |
Portugal |
39.64 |
7.74 |
2.74 |
0.54 |
Cyprus |
58.03 |
9.07 |
3.86 |
0.60 |
Iceland |
73.66 |
14.39 |
3.09 |
0.60 |
Lithuania |
12.80 |
5.00 |
1.55 |
0.61 |
Malta |
53.34 |
10.42 |
3.77 |
0.74 |
Jordan |
14.06 |
2.75 |
4.15 |
0.81 |
Denmark |
51.82 |
20.24 |
2.11 |
0.82 |
China |
30.10 |
7.84 |
3.70 |
0.96 |
Croatia |
24.26 |
9.48 |
2.62 |
1.02 |
Estonia |
49.72 |
4.86 |
10.58 |
1.03 |
Venezuela |
42.95 |
11.18 |
4.02 |
1.05 |
Hungary |
57.36 |
22.41 |
2.71 |
1.06 |
Finland |
47.63 |
18.61 |
2.79 |
1.09 |
Spain |
29.21 |
7.61 |
4.23 |
1.10 |
Malaysia |
68.90 |
13.46 |
7.03 |
1.37 |
Argentina |
22.44 |
8.77 |
3.71 |
1.45 |
Brazil |
71.19 |
27.81 |
3.89 |
1.52 |
New Caledonia |
76.15 |
14.87 |
9.02 |
1.76 |
Poland |
35.50 |
13.87 |
4.64 |
1.81 |
Chile |
106.10 |
41.44 |
8.01 |
3.13 |
Bahrain |
57.46 |
22.44 |
8.01 |
3.13 |
Mexico |
75.31 |
29.42 |
10.11 |
3.95 |
Latvia |
80.00 |
31.25 |
11.62 |
4.54 |
Costa Rica |
99.00 |
19.34 |
24.75 |
4.83 |
Peru |
93.26 |
36.43 |
16.58 |
6.48 |
Grenada |
238.65 |
93.22 |
24.65 |
9.63 |
Saudi Arabia |
174.75 |
68.26 |
31.39 |
12.26 |
Affordable access
In addition to broadband availability and supply, another decisive factor
affecting broadband take-up is the price charged to the user. Despite increasing
levels of competition as different broadband technologies and players enter the
market, and the resulting gradual decline in prices, broadband subscriptions
worldwide lie within a range that does not always reflect average incomes in
individual economies. Affordability is, therefore, relative. As Table 1 shows,
in the fifty cheapest broadband economies, monthly subscription as a percentage
of monthly income can range from just over 1 per cent (Japan) to over 20 per
cent (Costa Rica, Saudi Arabia), and the price per 100 kbit/s as a percentage of
monthly income can range from 0.01 per cent (Japan) to over 12 per cent (Saudi
Arabia). These remain the most affordable broadband suppliers, with offerings in
other economies truly stretching affordability and limiting growth of the
broadband market.
Railway lines lead to broadband access in rural
India
India has one of the world’s most
widespread and dense rail networks with 8000 train stations nationwide and an
average distance of only eight kilometres between them. One approach to
expanding access that has been applied in India is to allow winning bidders for
fixed-line services to convert their licences to wireless local loop (WLL)
licences, which has led to the use of the railway network to provide Internet
access.
In a plan launched in 2000, the Railroad Internet project aims to make use of
some 65 000 kilometres of underused cable infrastructure already in place. This
signalling cable (which is usually copper-based, although fibre is used on
several main routes) runs along the train tracks and has large amounts of spare
capacity. It will be used to transmit Internet traffic to outlying areas,
avoiding laying a new cable network.
Under the project, it is envisioned to set up special cybercafé kiosks
(providing community Internet access and ticket services) at each train station,
with computers networked together and linked up to the railway cable. The speed
of the connections will vary according to the quality of cable segments. The
railway system can link up to the standard telephone network through high-speed
digital links at major towns.
The project is being piloted in a small area along 40 km of railway track
linking the southern towns of Vijayawada and Guntur. This initial phase has been
launched through cooperation between Indian Railways (State owned) and private
investors.
Sources: Indian Railways (2001). BBC, “Fast track for Indian
Internet” (31 May, 2000).
|
|