Measuring Community Access
Access to information and communication technologies (ICT) is a critical
topic, particularly in the on-going global discussion on how to bring the
benefits of the information society to everyone.
The World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS) has provided a fresh impetus
for international efforts to bridge the digital divide. The first phase of WSIS,
held in Geneva in 2003, produced a Declaration of Principles and a Plan of
Action that recognize that ICT infrastructure is crucial in achieving the goal
of digital inclusion. The United Nations Millennium Declaration also
acknowledges ICT as an important tool to achieve the overall Millennium
Development Goals. But how do we measure the true extent of access to ICT and to
the information society?
Identifying the right indicators to collect meaningful data is crucial to
clarify the real magnitude of the digital divide in both its domestic and
international dimensions. One aspect of access to ICT that has rarely received
due attention is community access. The growing number of people, particularly in
the developing world, who access ICT at public facilities, calls for the
development of appropriate indicators to reflect this reality.
Why community access matters
As the world’s primary source of global, impartial ICT/telecommunication
statistics, ITU has a clear mandate to develop community access indicators.
It has been widely acknowledged that traditional indicators alone — such as the
number of fixed telephone lines — are not sufficient to identify the extent of
the digital divide. Nor can they tell the entire truth about the potential of
digital opportunities.
Household penetration rates, for example, are likely to be much lower in the
developing world, since the vast majority of homes in developing countries do
not have modern ICT facilities such as computers and the Internet. But since
only few countries — and mainly the most industrialized ones — have carried out
Internet user surveys, it is difficult to determine the exact number of public
Internet users worldwide.
Current data suggest that community access is playing an important role in
providing the citizens of most developing countries with access to ICT — a
prerequisite for participating in the information society and reaping its
benefits.
Even in so-called middle-income economies, over one-third of all those online
use public Internet facilities. While developed countries tend to have lower
public Internet facility access rates (in Canada, only 1.2 per cent of Canadian
households report that a member uses the Internet from an Internet café), some
have used public facilities to spread the Internet to areas that are difficult
to connect. In Spain, for example, "red.es", a public business agency associated
with the country’s Ministry of Industry, Tourism and Commerce, is delivering
free and high-speed Internet access to thousands of public users located in
rural areas of the country that are bereft of broadband access. The project is
expected to benefit over 1.3 million citizens in the coming years.
A lack of community access indicators and data
To assess the current status of community access indicators, earlier this year
ITU sent a questionnaire to all telecommunication/ICT regulators, ministries and
national statistical offices. While some 80 countries responded to the
questionnaire, around half noted that no data were available. What’s more, the
data provided by the remaining countries were often incomplete, and showed
several inconsistencies. This suggests that while a number of countries have
realized the importance of community access, there is still a lack of harmonized
indicators that can be compared on a global scale. The collection process also
shows a lack of cooperation in some countries between the different agencies
dealing with ICT and statistics. Only very few countries have actually started
to collect information on public Internet access centres (PIAC) as defined in
the questionnaire (see Figure 2). And where national initiatives and projects to
monitor and track community access exist, these are usually guided by specific
geographic, societal and economic characteristics and are often not
internationally comparable.
Figure 2 — How to define community access facilities: PIACs and DCCs |
A
public Internet access centre (PIAC) is a site, location, or centre of
instruction at which Internet access is made available to the public, on
a full-time or part-time basis. This may include digital community
centres, Internet cafés, libraries, education centres and other similar
establishments, wherever they offer Internet access to the general
public. All such centres should have at least one public computer for
Internet access. It is very useful to classify centres by type, and a
further breakdown into private and governmental establishments is also
helpful. |
|
A
digital community centre (DCC) is a place where the public can access
Internet services from terminal facilities placed at their disposal. A
DCC is an undertaking based on a government framework for universal
access. It should offer equitable, universal and affordable access.
Minimum requirements for a PIAC to be considered as a DCC include:
-
At least one
computer and one printer.
-
A minimum
connection speed of 64 kbit/s per centre to the Internet service
provider (ISP), with an acceptable amount of bandwidth available to
users.
-
Support and
maintenance.
-
Minimum
opening hours per week: 20 hours.
|
Other PIACs, including cybercafés, education centres may be classified
as DCC, or PIACs, depending on the conditions they satisfy.
|
How to measure community access?
There are different ways of measuring community access - for example, through
the inclusion of a specific question in an Internet user survey. This would
provide basic information on the number/or percentage of people using public
Internet facilities. Some countries, such as those of the European Union, have
started collecting data on the number of public Internet access points. But one
major limitation with this indicator is that it does not show the distribution
of facilities. Nor does it provide a basis for a recommended value, since this
would be a function of how necessary public Internet access centres are (which
in turn depends on the underlying level of ICT ownership). For this reason, many
favour the approach of look at the number of villages (including towns and
cities) with public Internet access facilities.
Identifying a core set of community access indicators, as shown in Table 1,
could help countries in their choice of indicators when carrying out Internet
user surveys or collecting administrative data from public Internet access
centres. Apart from guiding ITU in its data collection efforts, the list also
provides national regulators, ministries and statistical offices responsible for
compiling market statistics with a clear guideline on the kind of data they
should collect.
For the time being, a major objective is to understand how many villages, towns
or cities within countries have public Internet access facilities and the
percentage of the population these facilities cover. The core list highlights
the need to distinguish between PIACs — the general term used to refer to any
public facility offering Internet access — and so-called digital community
centres (DCC), which must fulfil certain requirements (such as providing
affordable access) and are usually subsidized or run by government.
Table 1 — Indicators to measure the extent and potential of public
Internet access centres (PIAC) |
|
Indicator |
Criteria |
|
Number of villages with PIACs |
The
term "villages" refers to a nation’s villages, towns and cities. |
|
Percentage of the population with access to a PIAC |
These indicators measure the number of inhabitants who enjoy PIAC
coverage as a proportion of the total population of the country. It is
considered that when a village has at least one PIAC then the entire
population in the community is served by that PIAC. |
|
Potential DCC user population |
A
potential DCC user is anyone of age 6 years or more. |
|
Target population for DCC services |
The
target population refers to the potential population (see above) minus
the number of non-community Internet users (non-community Internet users
are those citizens that have Internet access from a point different from
a PIAC, for example at home). |
|
Total number of DCCs |
|
|
Total number of other PIACs |
|
|
Total number of computers in DCCs |
|
|
Average number of computers per DCC |
|
|
Number of users per type of PIAC (DCCs, other PIACs) |
|
|
Actual DCC usage percentage |
To
calculate this, countries should divide the actual number of DCC users
by the target population for DCC services. A user is defined
as a person who accesses the Internet at least once a month. |
|
Average DCC usage rate |
To
calculate this, countries should divide the total DCC usage time
by the total available DCC time. |
|
Source: Extracted from the recommendation made by the Global Indicators
Workshop on Community Access to ICT, Mexico City (Mexico), November 2004
(see
www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/mexico04/). |
|