|
The Internet has grown from a small experiment into
a collaborative network with more than 1.6 billion
users today. From a simple means of communication
among computers, the Internet, coupled with the
spread of broadband, has emerged as a fundamental
part of modern society. In addition, the Internet has
gone mobile with devices already used by millions of
people, and potentially billions. According to analysts
Nielsen Mobile, the number of people surfing the
Internet on mobile phones has doubled since 2006
— and some predict that by 2012 there will be more
wireless Internet users than wired. This is especially
true for developing countries, and the Internet must
meet the needs of those users.
| |
|
| Photo credit: Alex Segre/Alamy |
Meanwhile, the deployment of higher speed mobile
Internet access in developed countries continues
apace, alongside the launch of smartphones. And
increasingly, sensors are being added to networks.
This is extending the system to objects that are fitted
with radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags, creating
an Internet of things.
On top of all these networks and devices lies a
vast array of applications that range from YouTube
and Facebook to e-commerce, e-government, e-education
and e-health.
To meet the demands of new applications, services
and users, and to fulfil its role as a vital part of
national and global infrastructure, the Internet is
continually evolving. But is the underlying architecture
robust enough to continue adapting to evergrowing
demands?
ITU’s Telecommunication Standardization Sector
(ITU–T) issued its tenth Technology Watch Report* in
April 2009 entitled “The Future Internet”. It examines the
debate over the Internet architecture and provides
pointers for future standards work within ITU–T
and the broader standards community.
|
The Future Internet was published as part of
ITU’s function of surveying the environment of information
and communication technologies (ICT), by
identifying new and emerging technologies and assessing
their likely impact on future standardization
work and on developing countries. Formal recognition
of the Technology Watch function was given
in Resolution 66 of the World Telecommunication
Standardization Assembly in Johannesburg in
October 2008.
|
Framing the debate
The existing architecture of the Internet dates
back to the 1970s and was designed to create simplified network and implementation protocols, guided
by concepts such as layering and packet switching. Among the goals of this architecture are connection
of existing networks; cost-effectiveness; survivability;
support of multiple types of services; accommodation
of a variety of physical networks, and allowing
distributed management and resource accountability
| |
|
| Photo credit: © WoodyStock/Alamy |
To cope with the unforeseen spread of the Internet
and new applications, various solutions have been
found that are seen by some observers as temporary
“patches”. There have been periodic calls to purge
the Internet of the accumulation of such patches and
to adopt a radical “clean-slate” approach. Those who
hold this view contend that an “Internet of the future”
should be created on a new architecture that
would offer better security. In contrast, others say
that the existing architecture should be allowed to
continue to evolve.
The evolutionary view
The evolutionary view is that the Internet should
continue as it has over the past decade, with targeted
patches being added to fix problems as they
emerge. To meet the challenges of disruptive technologies,
one suggested solution is the use of overlay
networks that can provide performance and reliability
without competing with existing infrastructure.
This position is based on the view that the Internet is
now fully commercial and the investments by operators
and individuals make an evolutionary approach
essential. In any case, firms that have invested billions
of dollars will ensure that the current form of
the Internet survives and prospers. It has also been
pointed out that the original architecture has already
shown that it can be adapted to new services and
applications that were not imagined when the
Internet began.
Some supporters of the evolutionary view say
that such common problems as security and spam
are not the result of architecture. In a presentation at
the Internet Governance Forum in Hyderabad, India,
in December 2008, Bob Kahn, one of the original
creators of the Internet, proposed new standards for
“digital object architecture”, to enable better information
flows across the Internet. He contends that
this would address the problems, but keep the basic
architecture intact.
The clean-slate approach
The proposal to start anew with a different architecture
was put dramatically by Professor Dave
Clark of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in
the United States, who served as the Internet’s chief
protocol architect during much of the 1980s. In an
article entitled “The Internet is Broken” published in
2005, he wrote that “the Net’s basic flaws cost firms
billions, impede innovation, and threaten national security.
It’s time for a clean-slate approach.”
A number of initiatives are already under way to
reinvent the Internet in this way. Among the major
challenges being addressed in these efforts are security
and privacy; resistance to distributed denial of service attacks; end-to-end quality of service and
quality of experience; mobility; reliability; addressing,
and identity.
The United States, for example, has provided
government funding for projects on Internet design,
such as that of the US National Science Foundation
(NSF), which has invested around USD 20 million in
two projects: the Global Environment for Network
Innovations (GENI) and Future Internet Design (FIND).
The GENI vision is to create a national facility to explore
radical design for future global networking infrastructure,
based on people and content.
Another initiative is the interdisciplinary Clean
Slate Internet Design Program by Stanford University
in the United States, launched in March 2007 to “reinvent
the Internet”. It is predicated on two questions:
“With what we know today, if we were to
start again with a clean slate, how would we design
a global communications infrastructure?” and
“How should the Internet look in 15 years from now?
It is supported by industry partners such as Cisco
Systems, Deutsche Telekom, NTT DoCoMo, NEC and
Xilinx, as well as the United States National Science
Foundation.
In Japan, the National Institute of Information
and Communications Technology has launched
the Akari programme to develop a “new generation”
of network architecture by 2015–2020. The
aim is to find an ideal solution starting from a clean
slate, unimpeded by existing constraints. Major
initiatives under the European Union’s Framework
Programmes for technological development include
the think-tank Evolved Internet Future for European
Leadership (EIFFEL), established by a group of researchers
in 2006, and the Future Internet Research
and Experimentation (FIRE) project. FIRE is focused
on exploring “new and radically better technological
solutions for the future Internet”, while preserving its
current advantages of openness, freedom of expression
and ubiquitous access.
Meeting future needs: the key trends
Meanwhile, several trends are shaping the future
demands to be placed on the Internet’s architecture
and design. These include powerful search engines,
social networks, online media and mobile access. The
Technology Watch Report points to mobile Internet
access, Web 2.0 and cloud computing as emerging
trends to be considered by the ITU–T membership in
its future standards work. The report underlines that
the growing popularity of cloud computing as a business
model will place further strains on the Internet,
particularly with regard to security, reliability and cost
of access. ITU published a Technology Watch Report
on cloud computing in March 2009 (see ITU News of
April 2009).
Progress in 3G and 4G
ITU’s Radiocommunication Sector (ITU–R) continues
its work, in partnership with organizations in the
wireless mobile broadband industry, to harmonize
the advances being made in third-generation (3G)
and 3.5G wireless technologies known as time division
multiple access (TDMA), code division multiple
access (CDMA) and orthogonal frequency division
multiple access (OFDMA). In their latest versions,
these technologies offer very significant improvements
in throughput, performance and overall user
experience. Using an all-IP packet-based network,
they enable operators to reduce the number of network
elements between subscribers and the Internet.
Higher speeds and increased support of full mobile
broadband will allow the end user to run applications
and services that are associated today with wired
broadband networks.
To set the stage for the new wireless future, in
2003 ITU–R provided a strategic vision called IMTAdvanced,
and a plan and related standards are in place to achieve it. IMT-Advanced (or 4G) is a leap
beyond IMT-2000 (or 3G), as it offers new capabilities
for the physical layer of the radio interface and
brings into play better management and control of
radio resources, advanced capabilities for spectrum
channel and bandwidth aggregation, and improved
performance at all levels, including quality of service
(see the December 2008 issue of ITU News).
The Internet of services
The Internet of services (IOS) is another area that
has been very successful. The best known class of
services is e-commerce, with such leading firms as
eBay and Amazon. The importance of searching
and of the related advertising revenues enabled the
growth of Google. Similarly, the development of social
networking saw Facebook and its competitors
grow rapidly. Now location-based services, such as
those that tell you where your friends are, or where
to find a suitable local restaurant, are expected to
extend social networking systems to mobile devices.
The problem for network design has been the unpredictable
nature of the successes (and failures) of
services, making it difficult to know the nature and
levels of traffic they will generate.
Internet and television
Already, in some countries, people spend more
time online than watching television. As the Internet
encroaches on the market share and advertising revenues
of traditional broadcast media, new technologies
are emerging to facilitate Internet viewing over
television sets.
For instance, the electronics manufacturer LG, of
the Republic of Korea, recently introduced a television
set that allows wireless Internet viewing. Chip maker
Intel is partnering with Yahoo to produce a widget that lets television viewers send e-mails, trade shares
or check the weather while watching programmes.
New web technologies
New web technologies may change the nature of
data fl ows and searches on the Internet. An example
is the “semantic web” that has been described by
Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web,
as the “web of the future”. It would allow any item,
such as a photo or a bank statement, to be linked
to any other. Instead of a collection of pages, the
semantic web would enable direct connectivity between
much lower-level pieces of information, giving
rise to new services. However, it would also raise
new privacy and security challenges.
Internet islands
It has been widely observed that the open, transparent
nature of the Internet is one of the key reasons
for its success and its global reach. But there are
concerns that the global system could break up into
“islands” or that some parts could be closed off, due
in large part to security concerns.
Professor Jonathan Zitrain of Harvard Law School
in the United States has warned that we face a wholesale
revision of the Internet and personal computer environment of the past 30 years. “The change is
coming partly because of the need to address security
problems peculiar to open technologies, and partly
because businesses want more control over the experience
that customers have with their products.”
He adds that “the trend from open systems towards
closed ones threatens the culture of serendipitous
tinkering that has given us the web, instant messaging,
peer-to-peer networking, Skype, Wikipedia and
a host of other innovations”.
Others refer to the possibility of the Internet becoming
a “gated community”, where users may have
to sacrifice certain freedoms and anonymity in return
for better security. This is already the case for many
corporate and government Internet users.
Will there be traffic jams?
The rapid growth of the Internet has placed new
demands on communication networks. New technologies
that generate large quantities of traffic include
video-sharing sites, videoconferencing, movie downloads, online gaming, remote medical imaging
and online storage of documents.
Some claim that the Internet will collapse under
the weight of traffic. A recent study by analysts
Nemertes Research concludes that, by 2012, demand
will exceed total broadband capacity at the access
layer of the Internet and will require investment
of some USD 137 billion over the next five years to
keep pace.
Other observers consider that the growth
will be manageable, largely due to declining unit
costs. Andrew Odlyzko, a computer scientist at the
University of Minnesota, United States, estimated
that Internet traffic in 2007 was between three and
five exabytes worldwide (an exabyte is 1018, or a
quintillion, bytes). This represented an annual growth
of 50–60 per cent — down from 100 per cent in
prior years, indicating that the rate of growth is
slowing. TeleGeography Research has published figures
showing that between 2007 and 2008, capacity
grew faster than traffic.
Conclusion
The existing architecture of the Internet has
proved to be capable of permitting the creation and
rapid expansion of such features of modern life as
eBay, Google, YouTube, Skype and Facebook. Despite
some critics, evolutionary changes to the original design
have been adequate to meet most new needs.
The next few years are likely to see further deployment
of IP over mobile networks and, in developed
countries, over fibre-to-the-home.
However, security concerns and rising cybercrime
lend support to calls for a clean-slate approach to
the future Internet. The evolutionary approach is ongoing,
but will there be a tipping point that would
favour a move to a clean slate? Only time will tell.
* The Future Internet and all previous ITU–T Technology Watch Reports can be downloaded at
www.itu.int/ITU-T/techwatch. These reports are prepared by the Telecommunication Standardization Bureau (TSB).
|