The status of VoIP
Around the world, voice
over Internet protocol (VoIP) services are being offered by local and
long-distance telephone operators, cable television companies, Internet service
providers, non-facilities-based independent providers and mobile operators. VoIP
is showing strong growth in the number of subscribers and the revenues it
generates.
|
Voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) broadly includes:
-
Voice over broadband (VoB)
-
Voice over digital subscriber line (DSL)
-
Voice over Internet (VoI)
-
Voice over wireless local area network, and
-
Internet telephony.
All these technologies involve the digitization,
conversion and compression of voice signals into data packets that are
transmitted over an IP network, to be reassembled and converted back
into voice communication at the receiver’s end.
|
Why VoIP is gaining ground
The main factors driving VoIP take-up and deployment include:
For businesses:
- Security at a lower cost: For institutional and business users, a private
network can offer cost efficiencies as well as greater security and reliability,
with no discernible loss in quality of service.
For consumers:
- Cheaper and simpler pricing: The explosive growth of companies such as Skype
and Vonage demonstrates the power of consumer demand in driving the growth of
VoIP. Consumers can also find bundling and flat-rate pricing packages attractive
in an increasingly complex multimedia environment.
For service providers:
|
Cisco |
The obstacles to VoIP
In some markets, however, VoIP does not seem to be achieving its full
potential. Some of the obstacles to growth are:
- Problems with QoS and reliability: Voice, video and high-speed data services
have different requirements, so bundled products place different burdens on
networks in terms of quality of service (QoS). The ability of the network to
function despite power shortages is a particular problem in developing
countries. In terms of security, only limited calling party information may be
available over VoIP.
- Resistance by incumbents: Established operators may see VoIP as a threat to
their PSTN revenues, mainly in countries where the market is monopoly-based or
less mature.
- Regulatory uncertainty. Operators argue that, in order to justify heavy
investment in broadband networks for VoIP, they must have a clear and
predictable regulatory framework that helps to guarantee returns on investment.
- Specific regulatory requirements: Some countries are developing regulations
on VoIP (e.g. emergency call obligations) that may make it harder for new
entrants to offer VoIP services.
Market prospects
Figure 1 — Estimates of VoIP subscribers, total and as a
proportion of mainlines worldwide, 2005–2011 |
|
|
|
Source: iDATE. |
|
Estimates of the total VoIP market size vary significantly, in part due to
the problems of definition, and because of the different technologies in use.
Quantifying the number of VoIP subscribers, or minutes of traffic, is difficult,
as it is part of a general migration to IP-based services. What is clear,
however, is that the VoIP market is growing rapidly worldwide in terms of
subscribers, revenues and traffic.
VoIP subscribers
|
Figure 2 — Distribution of VoIP subscribers worldwide,
March 2005 |
|
|
|
Source: Point Topic. |
Excluding calls made from computer to computer, the number of subscribers to
VoIP services has been estimated for the end of 2005 at 25 million worldwide,
according to French research company iDATE. This number surpassed 47 million
subscribers at the end of 2006, and is expected to grow to approximately
250 million by the end of 2011 (see Figure 1).
Japan is the largest market for VoIP, with more than 60 per cent of the
worldwide total of subscribers in March 2005, according to UK-based broadband
analysts Point Topic (see Figure 2). Strong growth has been registered in
France, where the regulator, Autorité de Régulation des Communications
électroniques et des Postes (ARCEP), reported that the number of VoIP
subscribers amounted to 1.5 million in March 2005. In the United Kingdom, the
regulator, Ofcom, estimated that by March 2006, there were more than 1.8 million
VoIP households. Of these, Ofcom estimated that around 1.35 million (or 75 per
cent) were using such services as Skype and Vonage. This capturing of market
share by VoIP services based on computer-to-computer communication is also seen
in the United States, where it represents the bulk of US subscriber growth.
VoIP traffic and revenues
Voice traffic sent over the Internet looks no different from most other types
of data, so it is difficult to discover its volume. Nevertheless, estimates have
been made of the total proportion of voice traffic carried over IP networks
worldwide. They show a strong upward trend.
Point Topic estimates that revenues from IP telephony services grew from USD
833 million in 2004 to USD 1 834 million in 2005, a rise of 89 per cent. US
analysts Telegeography predict that revenues from VoIP will reach USD 5 billion
by 2010. Other estimates are much higher. According to Juniper Research, of the
United Kingdom, revenues from VoIP services in the business sector alone will
reach USD 18 billion by 2010, with hosted VoIP business revenues reaching USD
7.6 billion.
Regulatory responses
Faced with such strong market growth of VoIP,
regulatory responses can be broadly classified into those countries
where:
- VoIP has been made illegal, often to protect the
revenues of the incumbent (and government, where the incumbent is
State-owned). These are often developing countries.
- Regulation is absent, often temporarily while the
regulator reaches a decision regarding VoIP, often through public
consultation.
- VoIP is unregulated, following a policy decision to that
effect.
- VoIP is subject to the same (or similar) regulation as
PSTN, or some forms of VoIP are subject to some or all of the PSTN
regulations, depending on the technology used (hence the importance of
definitions).
- Specific VoIP regulations are in place, including for
licensing.
A number of countries have yet to formally decide
their framework for VoIP regulation, including those which have held
formal public consultations, and those where the framework is "under
consideration".
|
In some countries, a "grey market" exists for VoIP services that are not
provided legally, and significant losses of revenue are reported by legitimate
operators (see Voice in the developing world). In Pakistan, for example, the
Telecommunications Authority says that grey traffic costs USD 50 million each
year. The grey market in African countries is similarly significant. The
Nigerian operator Nitel, for instance, estimated that before its 2004 reduction
in the price of international calls, 90 per cent of international calls went
through the grey market.
|