There is often interest in how to write X.400 email addresses on business cards. A CCITT Study Group has now had approved a proposal on how to do this. This Recommendation will be published in a few months (fall 92). It is currently in an Annex of CCITT Study Group I Report R 44. I talked with the CCITT counsellor responsible for Study Group I and he agreed that I could pass on this relevant text. Bob Shaw Information Services Department International Telecommunication Union Place des Nations 1211 Geneva, Switzerland Voice: +41 22 730 5338/5554 FAX: +41 22 730 5337 Internet: shaw@itu.arcom.ch X.400:G=robert;S=shaw;P=itu;A=arcom;C=ch MCI: rshaw Compuserve: 100012,2025 Title: REPORT OF THE FINAL MEETING OF STUDY GROUP I, GENEVA, 24 MARCH-3 APRIL 1992: DRAFT NEW AND REVISED RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE F.400, F.500-SERIES, CURRENTLY BEING SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BY MEANS OF CCITT RESOLU- TION NO. 2. This text is extracted from Annex B of CCITT Study Group I Report R 44. ANNEX B Representation of O/R addresses for human usage (This Annex does not form an integral part of this Recommendation) (This Annex is aligned with ISO/IEC 10021-2, Annex F(DAM) and is referenced forward in Recommendation X.402) B.1 Purpose An O/R address consists of a set of attribute values taken from a total of 31 possible attributes. In order to represent visually an address to a human user, and to enable the user to enter the address into a user interface, each attribute value needs to be associated with the correct attribute type. Many of the full attribute types given in CCITT Rec. X.402 are too long for convenient usage on paper or a screen. There is a need for a format which allows attributes to be represented concisely, e.g. on a business card. This Annex specifies how addresses can be expressed concisely using labels to represent the attribute types. There are three categories of attributes: those standard mnemonic attributes which are most likely to be found in O/R addresses represented for human exchange (e.g. on business cards), those used in physical delivery addresses, and other specialized attributes (including domain defined attributes). In order to provide a format which is as concise as possible, many of the labels are single characters. This also makes them less language dependent. Clause B.3 specifies the format for the representation of addresses, and clause B.4 specifies the characteristics necessary for user interfaces which are intended to be used in conjunction with this format. B.2 Scope A labelled format for the communication of O/R addresses to human users is specified. The format consists of a set of pairs of labels and attribute- values. The characteristics of a user interface which are necessary to accept addresses given in this format are also specified. In addition a self-explanatory format suitable for use where there is more space, e.g. in printed material and in the user interface, is specified. B.3 Format B.3.1 General Some systems are capable of accepting messages when certain optional attributes of the recipient's O/R address (e.g. OUs) are omitted by the originator. In these circumstances it is normally preferable to use the shortest acceptable form of the address when representing the address for human usage. Note 1 - OUs should only be used to disambiguate users with the same Surname if this cannot be achieved by the use of other name attributes (Given Name, Initials, or Generation Qualifier). The use of additional OUs for this purpose has the disadvantage that the user's O/R name will change if the naming of the OUs changes, or if the user moves to a different OU. Where national usage permits a single space value for the ADMD in an address, this may be represented in the address either by omitting the ADMD attribute, or showing the ADMD attribute with no value or the value of a space. Note 2 - When sending messages internationally, there may be difficulties in reaching a recipient if a single space ADMD name is specified. If the attributes of an O/R address include characters from an extended character set, human users who do not normally use the same extended character set may have difficulty representing the O/R address or entering it into their messaging system. B.3.2 Labelled format B.3.2.1 Syntax O/R addresses in labelled format consist of delimited pairs of labels and values in the syntax