Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR)
1 Introduction
2 Regulatory status of the services having
allocations in the 3 400-4 200 MHz band
2.1 Definitions
2.2 Table of frequency allocations
2.3 Coordination contours to protect
FSS receive earth station
3 FSS systems in the 3 400-4 200 MHz band
3.1 Examples of FSS deployments
3.2 Types of FSS receive earth
stations
3.3 Unregistered earth stations
3.4 Conclusions on satellite system
use of the 3 400-4 200 MHz band
4 Broadband wireless access systems in the
3 400-4 200 MHz band
5 Possible types of interference to the FSS
6 Sharing and compatibility studies and
results
6.1 Sharing between FSS and BWA (Co-frequency
emission problem)
6.2 Compatibility of FSS with
interference resulting from unwanted BWA emissions (Unwanted emission
problem)
6.3 FSS receiver overload (FSS
Receiver “saturation” problem)
7 Methods and techniques to enhance sharing
and compatibility
7.1 Individually licensed/registered
FSS earth stations at specific locations
7.2 BWA stations and/or FSS earth
stations deployed in a ubiquitous manner and/or without individual licensing or
registration
7.3 Possible techniques to avoid LNB
saturation
7.4 Example of National
Regulatory/Technical solutions
8 Conclusions
Annex A FSS and BWA system parameters
Attachment 1 to Annex A Spectrum masks for BWA base stations
Attachment 2 to Annex A Spectrum emission mask for terminal station
equipment operating in the band 3 400-3 800 MHz
Annex B Description of studies
1 Introduction
Attachment 1 to Annex B Study A – Compatibility between BWA
systems and FSS earth stations
1 Introduction
2 Compatibility study’s methodology and
assumptions
2.1 FSS system parameters
2.2 FSS earth station maximum
permissible interference
2.3 FSS ES antenna pattern
2.4 BWA system parameters
2.5 BWA base station antenna pattern
2.6 BWA terminal station antenna
pattern
2.7 BWA base station and terminal
station out-of-band emission
2.8 Propagation models
3 Results
3.1 BWA rural BS interfering with 32
m FSS ES
3.2 BWA rural BS interfering with 8
m FSS ES
3.3 BWA rural BS interfering with
1.2 m FSS ES
3.4 BWA urban BS interfering with 32
m FSS ES
3.5 BWA urban BS interfering with 8
m FSS ES
3.6 BWA urban BS interfering with
1.2 m FSS ES
3.7 BWA fixed-outdoor TS interfering
with 32 m FSS ES
3.8 BWA fixed-outdoor TS interfering
with 8 m FSS ES
3.9 BWA fixed-outdoor TS interfering
with 1.2 m FSS ES
3.10 BWA fixed-indoor TS interfering
with 32 m FSS ES
3.11 BWA fixed-indoor TS interfering
with 8 m FSS ES
3.12 BWA fixed-indoor TS interfering
with 1.2 m FSS ES
4 Conclusions
Attachment 2 to Annex B Description of Study B Evaluation
of Study A with BWA antenna patterns and propagation model parameters
1 Introduction
2 Evaluation
of parameters used in Recommendation ITU-R P.452-13
3 Set-up of simulations
4 Results of simulation
4.1 Scenario 1 (BWA sectoral antenna, smooth earth)
4.2 Scenario 2 (BWA sectoral antenna, actual terrain data)
4.3 Scenario 3 (BWA omnidirectional
antenna, smooth earth)
4.4 Scenario 4 (BWA omnidirectional
antenna, actual terrain data)
5 Discussion of assumptions
5.1 Clutter parameters
5.2 Use of sectorized antennas
5.3 Aggregate effect from multiple
cells
6 Conclusions
Attachment 3 to Annex B Description of Study C Simulations
for interference from a BWA system to FSS in The Netherlands
1 Assumptions for simulation
2 Simulation results
3 Conclusions
Attachment 4 to Annex B Description of Study D Study
of required separation distances in order to avoid LNB saturation or non-linear
behaviour
1 Introduction
2 LNB operational range
3 Set-up of simulations
4 Results of analysis
5 Discussion
of results
6 Aggregate
effects
7 Band-pass filters on LNBs
8 Conclusions
Annex C
Annex D Example of a national implementation FSS/BWA sharing
arrangements in the 3 400-4 200 MHz band in Australia
1 Introduction
2 Summary of the main sharing rules
3 Summary and conclusion