CONTENTS

Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR)
 1 Introduction
 2 Guidelines
 3 Overview of the methodologies
Annex 1  Relationship between the I/N criterion, the C/N degradation and the  corresponding interfering field strength
       A1.1 Received noise power and equivalent noise field strength
                  A1.1.1 Thermal noise power and equivalent noise field strength
                  A1.1.2 Environmental noise power and equivalent noise field strength
                  A1.1.3 Total receiver noise power and equivalent noise field strength
       A1.2 Equivalent noise field strength and minimum median field strength for planning
       A1.3 Field strength threshold related to I/N
       A1.4 Individual median effective interfering field strength
       A1.5 Multiple median effective interfering field strengths corresponding to I/N and equivalent C/N degradation
                  A1.5.1 Threshold based on median effective field strength
                  A1.5.2 Statistical considerations for threshold based on median effective field strength
                  A1.5.3 Threshold based on C/N degradation
Appendix 1 to Annex 1  Examples of field strength threshold calculation and C/N degradation for the case of DTTB fixed reception
Appendix 2 to Annex 1  Relationship between co-channel field strength and adjacent-channel field strength
Appendix 3 to Annex 1  Example of co-channel interference assessment threshold  for co-primary frequency allocations
Appendix 4 to Annex 1  Example of adjacent channel field strength interference assessment thresholds for co-primary frequency allocations
Appendix 5 to Annex 1  Method to assess co-channel and multiple-adjacent channel interference into the broadcasting service from all radiations and emissions without a corresponding frequency allocation in the bands allocated to broadcasting
 1 Co-channel assessment threshold for the broadcasting service
 2 An example of adjacent and multiple-adjacent channel interference assessment thresholds from all radiations and emissions without a corresponding frequency allocation in the bands allocated to the broadcasting service
Annex 2  Methodology for assessing degradation in DTTB reception location probability from interfering stations of other services/applications
       A2.1 Introduction
       A2.2 Methodology
       A2.3 Parameters
       A2.4 Nuisance fields and power summation
       A2.5 Monte Carlo simulation
       A2.6 Conclusion
Appendix 1 to Annex 2
 1 Introduction
 2 Relationship between I/N and degradation of the reception location probability
 3 Summary
Appendix 2 to Annex 2  Example Monte Carlo simulation with calculation saving methods