International Telecommunication Union   ITU
عربي  |  中文  |  Español  |  Français  |  Русский
 
 Advanced Search Advanced Search Site Map Contact us Print Version
 
Home : ITU-T Home : Study Groups : Study Group 5
   
Question 4/5 – Resistibility of communication equipment
(Continuation of Question 4/5)

Motivation

New types of equipment (examples are routers, set-top units, cable modems, ONTs, xDSL modems, and WLL) are appearing in the network. Also, different types of equipment are being interconnected at customers' premises and the requirements for the internal interfaces and the effects of these interconnections need to be considered.

At least four major changes have occurred which affect the requirements of the existing resistibility recommendations.

  1. The access network is rapidly changing from a traditional exchange (switching centre) which may be kilometres from the customer to the switching equipment being close to the customer. As an example, digital circuits (e.g. ISDN) are being used, high-speed data services (xDSL) are being introduced, voice can now be transmitted over the Internet and routers with packet-switching compete with conventional switching systems.
  2. POTs, data and video services are being generated in the customer building. The customer may want to route these services to other buildings. The ports connecting to these services are usually designed for connection to internal cables only.
  3. The environment where the equipment is housed is also changing. Traditionally switching equipment has been installed in a controlled environment with the protection installed in an MDF. With miniaturization and changing technologies bulky rack-mounted equipment has been replaced by small equipment, which may be installed on a wall, in a shelter or underground with the high current protection integral to the equipment.
  4. Many countries have regulations regarding grade of service where the operator can be fined if an adequate grade of service is not provided.
    These changes require study to determine what steps are required to ensure that the recommendations fit the needs of the operators and the user of the telecommunication network.

This Question impacts climate change issues by ensuring that adequate resistibility requirements for equipment and protective measures for installations reduce the amount of equipment and installation damages. By reducing damages less fossil fuels are burnt (personnel do not have to drive to a site to repair equipment) and less manufacturing is required (less replacement equipment is needed).

The following Recommendations, in force at the time of approval of this Question, fall under its responsibility:

  • K.20, K.21, K.44, K.45.

Question

The objective of this question is to produce resistibility requirements for equipment installed in telecommunications centres, in outdoor enclosures in the access and trunk networks and at customer premises. The sources of overvoltages and overcurrents that may cause damage to the equipment include lightning, power induction and mains power contacts. The types of interfaces include symmetric pair, coaxial, dedicated power feeds and mains power ports.
Study items to be considered include, but are not limited to:

  • Acceptable period for equipment recovery after application of surges (K.20, K.21, K.44 and K.45);
  • Power contact test, specifically whether a single line to earth test should be performed (K.20, K.21, K.45 and K.44).
  • Resistibility test level of ITE ports (e.g. USB, Ethernet, RS232, E1) compared with telecommunication ports (K.21).
  • Determine resistibility requirements taking into account the effects of interconnecting equipment connected to different services e.g. mains, symmetric pair telecommunications, services derived within the building, CATV broadband, WLL etc.

Tasks

Tasks include, but are not limited to:

  • Prepare a guide to assist in ensuring that compliance testing is done correctly. Due to cost constraints short cuts are often taken resulting in incomplete testing. As a result incorrect conclusions maybe drawn re compliance.
  • Maintenance and enhancement of the existing recommendations K.20, K.21, K.44, K.45 for protection of communication equipment.
    An up-to-date status of work under this Question is contained in the SG 5 Work Program (use URL as shown in the table below).
SG URL
5 http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/workprog/wp_search.aspx?isn_sp=545&isn_sg=548

Relationships

Recommendations:

  • K.11, K.12, K.27, K.28, K.35, K.36, K.66, K.67 and K.71

Questions:

  • 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15/5

Study Groups:

  • none

Standardization bodies:

  •  IEC TC 108, IEC TC 81, IEC SC 37A, IEC SC 77B WG13, CENELEC TC 81X, ETSI ERM

 

Top - Feedback - Contact Us -  Copyright © ITU 2008 All Rights Reserved
Contact for this page : TSB EDH
Updated : 2008-12-08