International Telecommunication Union   ITU
Site Map Contact us Print Version
 Tuesday, 26 July 2005

A very good article entitled Telecom: Conflict of Motives by Tom Nolle in the June 2005 issue of BCR Magazine discusses how the future of networking is often seen too simplistically as a fundamental conflict between "the Internet" and "the telcos". 

  • "The Internet supporters have a notion of good public policy: Anything over IP is unregulated. However, “unregulated” means free market dynamics will prevail, and so this position is actually self-defeating. What’s needed is a constructive open debate on what regulatory policy should be..."
  • "Proof point one is simple: “Prove that your concept of rampant innovation doesn’t necessarily mean free networks.” Somebody has to finance the network of the future."
  • "Proof point number two is more complicated: “Prove that revolutionary new opportunities are really opportunities and not just disruptions.” Pure research is wonderful and necessary, but when you talk about deploying worldwide infrastructure for services critical to the economic survival of many societies, you ought to be out of the experimenting phase."
  • Proof point number three is the most complicated of all: “Prove you won’t do it again.” We lied, as an industry. We lied to Wall Street, to Main Street, to regulators and to ourselves. The financial markets move on credibility. They will never understand this industry, our technology. They will have to take us at our word, and our word is no longer good. Every naïve comment about “profit,” every notion of “free” this or that, only validates the financial view that the best thing this industry can do is hunker down and control costs. Who better to do that than the “conservative” common carriers?